笔谈:古文书的史料价值与研究路径
发布时间：2018-10-15 10:33
【摘要】：正编者按:在中国古代史学界,甲骨文、简牍、敦煌文书、明清档案、徽州文书等出土或传世文书的研究已相当深入,形成了"甲骨学"、"简牍学"、"敦煌学"、"(明清)档案学"、"徽学"等学科。然而,这些学科受限于研究对象的时代性及存在形态的差异性,形成不同的概念与分类标准,始终缺乏一个能够将作为原始文献的古文书与一般编纂的典籍文献区分开来,进而从整体上概括中国古文书内在特点的理论体系。因此,非常有必要在历史学、文献学、档案学等既有学科的相关研究基础之上,参考国外古文书学的理论与经验,建立起跨断代的、涵盖公私文书研究的"中
[Abstract]:Editor's note: in ancient Chinese historiography, the study of unearthed or handed down documents, such as oracle bone inscriptions, bamboo slips, Dunhuang documents, Ming and Qing archives, and Huizhou documents, has been thoroughly studied. Such subjects as oracle bone study, bamboo slips study, Dunhuang study, (Ming and Qing) archives, Huixue and so on were formed. However, these disciplines are limited by the differences of the times and the forms of existence of the objects of study, forming different concepts and classification standards, and lacking a way to distinguish the ancient literature as the original literature from the general compilation of the classical books. And then generalize the theoretical system of the inherent characteristics of ancient Chinese literature books as a whole. Therefore, it is very necessary to establish a cross-dynasty, covering the study of public and private documents, on the basis of the relevant studies of the existing disciplines such as history, philology and archives, and referring to the theories and experiences of ancient Chinese calligraphy abroad.
【分类号】：K877
本文编号：2272271
[Abstract]:Editor's note: in ancient Chinese historiography, the study of unearthed or handed down documents, such as oracle bone inscriptions, bamboo slips, Dunhuang documents, Ming and Qing archives, and Huizhou documents, has been thoroughly studied. Such subjects as oracle bone study, bamboo slips study, Dunhuang study, (Ming and Qing) archives, Huixue and so on were formed. However, these disciplines are limited by the differences of the times and the forms of existence of the objects of study, forming different concepts and classification standards, and lacking a way to distinguish the ancient literature as the original literature from the general compilation of the classical books. And then generalize the theoretical system of the inherent characteristics of ancient Chinese literature books as a whole. Therefore, it is very necessary to establish a cross-dynasty, covering the study of public and private documents, on the basis of the relevant studies of the existing disciplines such as history, philology and archives, and referring to the theories and experiences of ancient Chinese calligraphy abroad.
【分类号】：K877
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 陈丽萍;;“中国古文书学”研讨会综述[J];中国史研究动态;2012年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 ;“中国古文书学”的创立[N];文汇报;2012年
，本文编号：2272271
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/2272271.html
