试论西藏发现的早期金属器和早期金属时代

发布时间：2019-02-22 20:52

【摘要】：正目次一西藏早期金属器的研究回顾二考古发现的西藏早期金属器三西藏早期金属器的基本特征四西藏早期金属器与周边文化之间的联系西藏的石器时代终止于何时,铜器时代何时开始?铁器又是什么时候传人的,长期以来,这些问题始终未能得到令人满意的答复。西藏考古史上发现的一些年代较早的金属制品,都属传世或采集品,不仅来源不详,而且绝大部分是由非专业人士所记述,并非考古发掘的遗物。因此,已故考古学家童恩正先生只能根据当时的情况提出西藏史前可能有过早期金属时代,并将其年代的上下限设置得极为宽泛,"这一时代可能开始于公元前一千年代,而结束于公元六世纪,即吐蕃王朝兴起之前"[1]。这个概念大致包括青铜时代和早期铁器时代。有学者认为,过去在中亚沙漠地带考古学研究不充分的情况下采用的一种具有相对普遍适用的工作假设,后
[Abstract]:Review of the basic characteristics of the early Tibetan Metals discovered by the second Archaeological Research four the relationship between the early Tibetan metal objects and the surrounding culture, when the Stone Age ended in Tibet, When did the Bronze Age begin? When iron was passed on, these questions have long been unanswered satisfactorily. Some of the earlier metal objects discovered in the history of archaeology in Tibet are inherited or collected from unknown sources, and most of them are recorded by non-professionals and are not relics of archaeological excavations. Therefore, the late archaeologist Tong Enzheng could only suggest, according to the circumstances at that time, that there might have been an early metal age in prehistoric Tibet, and that the upper and lower limits of its age had been set very broadly. "this age may have started in the 1000 BC," he said. And ended in the sixth century AD, before the rise of the Tubo dynasty "[1]. This concept largely includes the Bronze Age and the early Iron Age. Some scholars believe that a relatively universal working hypothesis has been adopted in the past when archaeological research in the desert region of Central Asia is inadequate.
【作者单位】：四川大学中国藏学研究所;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大招标项目“文物考古所见西藏与中原关系资料的整理与研究”(项目号11&ZD121)系列论文之一四川大学985、211工程建设项目等资助
【分类号】：K876.4

【参考文献】