洛阳地区东周时期墓葬研究
发布时间：2019-05-28 06:53
【摘要】：本文以洛阳地区东周时期的墓葬作为研究对象。依据随葬品的种类对墓葬进行分类;以器物类型学研究为基础,划分出具有不同文化面貌和发展体系的群别,并分别对各群墓葬进行分期和年代研究;运用文化因素分析方法确定各群墓葬所具有的主要及外来文化因素。最后通过以上研究探求墓葬所反映的社会各等级的变化情况以及洛阳地区与外部文化之间的交流影响情况。 论文的内容分为八个部分 第一部分:前言 对本文研究的时空框架进行了界定,总结了以往研究的成果和存在的不足。 第二部分:墓葬的形制、葬具与葬式 对墓葬的形制进行类型学研究,并概况了这一时期墓葬的葬具、葬式和随葬品的位置等情况。 第三部分:典型器物的类型学研究 对墓葬中随葬的铜礼器和陶器分别进行型式划分,明确了各类器物的发展演变规律。 第四部分:墓葬的分类与分群研究 依据随葬品的种类将墓葬分为铜礼器墓、仿铜陶礼器墓及日用陶器墓三类,并介绍了各类墓葬的主要特征与区别;在以往研究基础上,通过器物的类型学分析,将墓葬划分为甲、乙两群,并介绍了两群墓葬的主要特征与区别。 第五部分:墓葬的分期与年代研究 对甲、乙两群墓葬分别进行分期研究。在甲群墓葬中依据器物类型学分别对三类墓葬进行分组研究,通过共出器物建立了三类墓葬之间的横向联系,最后参考墓葬形制、葬式以及其他随葬器物将甲群墓分为六期十段,乙群墓则依据器物和墓葬形制等特征分为两期四段,并分别对两群墓葬的年代进行了讨论。 第六部分:文化因素分析 分析了甲、乙两群墓葬所发现的外来文化因素,并将具有外来文化因素的器物分为纯外来文化型、融合型及仿造型三类。并分析了甲、乙两群墓葬之间的相互影响情况。 第七部分:墓葬所反映的历史发展情况 根据不同时期各类墓葬的变化讨论了社会各等级的消长和变迁情况;通过对具有外来文化因素的器物及其所在单位进行分析,讨论了洛阳与其他地区文化间的交流情况,并分析了外来文化对甲、乙两群墓葬影响程度的不同及产生这种现象的原因。 第八部分:结语 总结了论文的主要研究和观点,提出存在的不足。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the tombs in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty in Luoyang as the research object. According to the types of funeral objects, the tombs are classified according to the types of funerals, and the groups with different cultural features and development systems are divided according to the study of utensil typology, and the stages and ages of each group of tombs are studied respectively. The main and foreign cultural factors of each group of tombs were determined by means of cultural factor analysis. Finally, through the above research, this paper explores the changes of various levels of society reflected by tombs and the influence of communication between Luoyang area and external culture. The content of this paper is divided into eight parts: the preface defines the temporal and spatial framework of this paper, and summarizes the results and shortcomings of the previous research. The second part: the shape of the tomb, the funeral utensils and the graveyard type to carry on the typological study to the graveyard shape, and has summarized the graveyard funeral utensils, the funerary type and the position of the funerary object and so on in this period. The third part: the typological study of typical utensils divides the bronze ritual ware and pottery buried in the tomb respectively, and clarifies the development and evolution law of all kinds of utensils. The fourth part: according to the classification and grouping of tombs, the tombs are divided into three categories: bronze ritual tombs, imitating copper pottery tombs and daily pottery tombs, and the main characteristics and differences of all kinds of tombs are introduced. On the basis of previous studies, through the typological analysis of utensils, the tombs are divided into two groups: group A and group B, and the main characteristics and differences of the two groups of tombs are introduced. The fifth part: the stage and chronology of the tomb, the two groups of tombs are studied by stages. According to the classification of utensils, the three kinds of tombs are divided into groups according to the type of utensils in Group A tombs, and the horizontal relations among the three types of tombs are established by co-producing utensils. Finally, the shape of tombs is referred to. The graveyard of Group A is divided into six stages and ten sections according to the characteristics of utensils and tomb shape, and the ages of the two groups of tombs are discussed respectively. the graveyard of Group B is divided into two stages and four stages according to the characteristics of utensils and tomb shape, and the ages of the two groups of tombs are discussed respectively. The sixth part analyzes and analyzes the foreign cultural factors found in the tombs of A and B, and divides the utensils with foreign cultural factors into three categories: pure foreign culture, fusion and imitation. The interaction between group A and group B tombs is analyzed. The seventh part: according to the changes of all kinds of tombs in different periods, the historical development reflected by tombs discusses the growth, decline and change of various levels of society. Based on the analysis of artifacts with foreign cultural factors and their units, this paper discusses the cultural exchanges between Luoyang and other regions, and analyzes the foreign culture against A. The influence degree of the two groups of tombs is different and the causes of this phenomenon. The eighth part: the conclusion summarizes the main research and the viewpoint of the paper, and puts forward the shortcomings.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：K878.8
本文编号：2486832
[Abstract]:This paper takes the tombs in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty in Luoyang as the research object. According to the types of funeral objects, the tombs are classified according to the types of funerals, and the groups with different cultural features and development systems are divided according to the study of utensil typology, and the stages and ages of each group of tombs are studied respectively. The main and foreign cultural factors of each group of tombs were determined by means of cultural factor analysis. Finally, through the above research, this paper explores the changes of various levels of society reflected by tombs and the influence of communication between Luoyang area and external culture. The content of this paper is divided into eight parts: the preface defines the temporal and spatial framework of this paper, and summarizes the results and shortcomings of the previous research. The second part: the shape of the tomb, the funeral utensils and the graveyard type to carry on the typological study to the graveyard shape, and has summarized the graveyard funeral utensils, the funerary type and the position of the funerary object and so on in this period. The third part: the typological study of typical utensils divides the bronze ritual ware and pottery buried in the tomb respectively, and clarifies the development and evolution law of all kinds of utensils. The fourth part: according to the classification and grouping of tombs, the tombs are divided into three categories: bronze ritual tombs, imitating copper pottery tombs and daily pottery tombs, and the main characteristics and differences of all kinds of tombs are introduced. On the basis of previous studies, through the typological analysis of utensils, the tombs are divided into two groups: group A and group B, and the main characteristics and differences of the two groups of tombs are introduced. The fifth part: the stage and chronology of the tomb, the two groups of tombs are studied by stages. According to the classification of utensils, the three kinds of tombs are divided into groups according to the type of utensils in Group A tombs, and the horizontal relations among the three types of tombs are established by co-producing utensils. Finally, the shape of tombs is referred to. The graveyard of Group A is divided into six stages and ten sections according to the characteristics of utensils and tomb shape, and the ages of the two groups of tombs are discussed respectively. the graveyard of Group B is divided into two stages and four stages according to the characteristics of utensils and tomb shape, and the ages of the two groups of tombs are discussed respectively. The sixth part analyzes and analyzes the foreign cultural factors found in the tombs of A and B, and divides the utensils with foreign cultural factors into three categories: pure foreign culture, fusion and imitation. The interaction between group A and group B tombs is analyzed. The seventh part: according to the changes of all kinds of tombs in different periods, the historical development reflected by tombs discusses the growth, decline and change of various levels of society. Based on the analysis of artifacts with foreign cultural factors and their units, this paper discusses the cultural exchanges between Luoyang and other regions, and analyzes the foreign culture against A. The influence degree of the two groups of tombs is different and the causes of this phenomenon. The eighth part: the conclusion summarizes the main research and the viewpoint of the paper, and puts forward the shortcomings.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：K878.8
【引证文献】
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 胡保华;中国北方出土先秦时期铜矛研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
，本文编号：2486832
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/2486832.html
