逻辑宿命论辩谬

发布时间：2018-04-08 07:19

本文选题：逻辑宿命论　切入点：自由意志　出处：《人文杂志》2017年10期

【摘要】：标准的逻辑宿命论论证ALF在形式结构上是具有效性的,但在语用层面存在着严重的说理谬误,即窃题;此外,ALF主要前提之一的真实性也未得到确保,无论其自身还是它转而依赖的结论都缺乏充足的理由,因此单纯逻辑视角下日常的宿命论观念站不住脚,预见真理与行动者自由意志并非逻辑地不相容。
[Abstract]:The standard logical fatalism proves that ALF is valid in formal structure, but there is a serious fallacy in pragmatics, that is to say, stealing the problem. In addition, the authenticity of one of the main premises of ALF has not been ensured.No matter it itself or the conclusion on which it has turned to rely on, there is no sufficient reason, so the daily fatalism concept in the pure logical perspective is not tenable, and the foresight of truth and the free will of the actors are not logically incompatible.
【作者单位】：南京大学哲学系、现代逻辑与逻辑应用研究所;
【基金】：江苏省社会科学基金一般项目“模态认识论研究”(16ZXB005) 国家社会科学基金重点项目“描述论和直接指称论之争———回顾、批判与建构”(12AZX008)
【分类号】：B815.3

【相似文献】