价值独断主义的终结——从“电车难题”看桑德尔的公正论

发布时间：2018-04-16 03:29

  本文选题：电车难题 + 价值冲突　； 参考：《哲学研究》2017年02期

【摘要】：本文从桑德尔提到的"电车难题"入手,从马克思主义价值论的视角考察西方学者在解答"道德难题"和"公正悖论"上的得失。作者指出,"难题"的困境表明,由于概念与历史实践的脱节,特别是存在于功利主义、自由主义、德性主义等理论中的价值独断主义传统,束缚了理论批判的视野,使思考陷入了规范冲突的"死结"。随着全球化和构建人类命运共同体的趋势,我们需要超越价值独断主义,认真面对价值规范的主体性特质,深入把握多元主体间的层次结构,并以主体权责统一到位的精准化判断,去突破传统思维的局限,以形成适应时代的道德和法律等价值思维和理念。
[Abstract]:This paper begins with Sandel's "tram puzzle" and examines the gains and losses of western scholars in solving "moral problems" and "paradox of justice" from the perspective of Marxist theory of value.The author points out that the dilemma of "difficult problems" shows that because of the disconnection between concept and historical practice, especially the tradition of value arbitrariness in utilitarianism, liberalism, virtue and other theories, it restricts the view of theoretical criticism.It makes thinking fall into the "dead knot" of the conflict of norms.With the trend of globalization and the construction of human destiny community, we need to transcend the arbitrariness of value, seriously face the subjective characteristics of value norms, and deeply grasp the hierarchical structure among multiple subjects.In order to break through the limitation of traditional thinking and to form the value thinking and idea of adapting to the times, this paper uses the accurate judgment of the unity of subject power and responsibility to break through the limitation of traditional thinking.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学人文学院;
【分类号】：B81-0
，

本文编号：1757117