准实在论的态度逻辑

发布时间：2018-06-03 03:18

  本文选题：道德命题 + 态度　； 参考：《哲学分析》2017年05期

【摘要】：准实在论把道德命题看作态度的表达并发展出道德语言的逻辑形式和态度推理的有效性说明。就准实在论态度逻辑总体来说,其真理紧缩论混淆了真理和真值,但有益于纠正真值实在论、理解推理有效性;其推理有效性说明已经触及一致性的逻辑有效性本质,因此对其混淆态度矛盾与逻辑矛盾的批评并未切中其要害。准实在论语用学片面理解道德判断的功能,混淆道德命题、态度描述命题和态度表达语句;通过把道德范畴看作渗透价值、把道德命题看作以此为基础的描述,道德命题语义学属性的确是反实在论的,但仍可以按紧缩论解释的逻辑真说明其推理有效性。
[Abstract]:Quasi-realism regards moral proposition as the expression of attitude and develops the logical form of moral language and the validity of attitude reasoning. In terms of quasi-realism attitude logic in general, its truth contraction theory confuses truth and truth value, but it is beneficial to correct truth-valued realism and to understand the validity of reasoning. Therefore, the criticism of its confused attitude contradiction and logic contradiction does not hit its key point. Quasi realism pragmatics one-sidedly understands the function of moral judgment, confuses moral proposition, attitude description proposition and attitude expression statement, and regards moral category as infiltrating value and moral proposition as a description based on it. The semantic attribute of moral propositions is indeed anti-realism, but it can be explained by the logic of contraction theory.
【作者单位】： 广东海洋大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金2015年第三批后期资助项目“准实在论研究”(项目编号:15FZX031)阶段性成果 广东省哲学社会科学“十二五”规划2012年度学科共建项目“价值观的理性:准实在论的启示”(项目编号:GD12XZX01)成果 广东海洋大学2012年度人文社科校级项目“准实在论研究:公共决策的一种哲学基础”成果
【分类号】：B81-0
，

本文编号：1971263