百年中国佛教量论因明学“唐疏”研究述评
本文选题:百年中国 + 佛教量论 ; 参考:《贵州大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:“岁月不居,时节如流”,指顾之间窥基的《因明大疏》由日本回返汉地已有百余年的历史,国内学者对汉传因明“唐疏”的研究亦有百余年之久。这一研究历程处在东西方文化激烈交锋与深度交流的新融合时代,经过近代的复苏、现代的高潮、当代的不断融合与发展,又在比较逻辑学、比较哲学、比较宗教学的大背景影响下,形成了百余年具有西方学术背景的“百年中国佛教量论因明‘唐疏’”研究的曲折历程,基于这一研究历程的深厚积淀,已经到了需要回顾总结的研究阶段。本课题研究的归属实质是“学术史”的研究范畴,遗憾的是,由于论域时间跨度大,论旨不易,且又涉及多种语言和多国学者的研究成果,到目前为止,学界尚无以“百年中国佛教量论因明学‘唐疏’研究”为题的专著出现。虽然也有不少以“百年中国汉传因明研究”这一类以总结、反思性为题的相关研究,但就目前学界的总结和回顾而言,还未全面实现自觉的总结与反思,未能在反思中彻底扭转以往“据西释中”的研究模式。唯有将“唐疏”的研究置于百年中国佛教量论因明学的学术背景下,才能真正从更高的视野对此进行合理的总结与反思并作出恰当的评判与鉴别,最终实现优良的继承与发扬。本文正是通过对汉传因明百余年“唐疏”研究的历程进行梳理与评述,指出研究中存在的一些误区和问题,并力图探索出未来“唐疏”研究中要解决的核心问题,为进一步挖掘和拓展汉传因明“唐疏”的研究空间开辟道路。
[Abstract]:"the years do not live, the season is like a flow," between the peek at the basis of the "Yiming Great sparse" from Japan back to the Han land has a history of more than 100 years, domestic scholars on the Han Dynasty due to Ming "Tang Shu" research has been for more than a hundred years. The course of this research is in the new fusion era of intense cultural confrontation and deep exchange between the East and the West. After the revival of modern times, the climax of modern times, the continuous integration and development of contemporary times, and the comparative logic and philosophy, Under the influence of comparative religion, the twists and turns of the study of "hundred years of Chinese Buddhist quantity theory due to the Ming Dynasty and the Tang Shu", which have the western academic background for more than a hundred years, are based on the deep accumulation of this research process. The stage of research that needs to be reviewed and summarized has been reached. The essence of this research is the study of "academic history". Unfortunately, due to the long time span of the domain, the purpose of the theory is not easy, and the research results of many languages and countries are involved, so far, There is no monograph on the subject of "the study of Tang Shu" of the hundred-year Chinese Buddhist Quantification Theory. Although there are many related studies on the topic of summing-up and reflection, such as "the study of Chinese Han Biography in a hundred years", but in terms of the summary and review of the academic circle at present, it has not fully realized the conscious summary and introspection. Failed to completely reverse the previous research mode of "according to the west" in the reflection. Only by putting the study of Tang Shu under the academic background of the Chinese Buddhist theory of quantity and imminence for a hundred years can we truly sum up and reflect on it from a higher perspective and make a proper judgment and identification, and finally realize the fine inheritance and development. This paper, through combing and commenting on the course of the study of Tang Shu in Han Dynasty, points out some misunderstandings and problems in the study, and tries to explore the core problems to be solved in the future study of Tang Shu. It opens the way for further exploring and expanding the research space of Tang Shu in Han Zhuan.
【学位授予单位】:贵州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B81-0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 沈海波;略论因明学史学上的若干问题[J];世界宗教研究;2004年03期
2 张晓翔;;首届国际因明学术研讨会概述[J];世界宗教研究;2006年03期
3 张忠义;;抢救绝学 发扬光大——首届国际因明学术研讨会综述[J];哲学动态;2006年09期
4 ;中国第三届因明学术研讨会在西宁召开[J];内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年04期
5 张忠义;刘纯;;因明风采 再现丝绸之路——中国第四届因明学术研讨会综述[J];哲学动态;2009年03期
6 思齐;;第六届全国因明学术研讨会在洛阳召开[J];中州学刊;2010年03期
7 ;第六届全国因明学学术研讨会[J];社会科学战线;2010年06期
8 张晓翔;;第七届全国因明学术研讨会综述[J];哲学动态;2012年02期
9 乐逸鸥;因明座谈会在北京召开[J];国内哲学动态;1982年06期
10 多识;;谈藏族对因明学的贡献[J];西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1992年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 刘培育;;因明三十四年[A];因明新探——首届因明学术讨论会论文集[C];1983年
2 波米·强巴洛卓;杨化群;宋晓嵇;;藏传因明的作用和基本内容——入因明学阶梯[A];因明研究[C];1990年
3 刘邦凡;唐歆;宋茜;;简论近代以来的我国因明教学[A];第一次南开逻辑学专业学人学术研讨会论文集[C];2012年
4 沈剑英;;因明学简论[A];全国逻辑讨论会论文选集[C];1979年
5 周文英;;因明在印度的发生和发展[A];因明论文集[C];1980年
6 沈剑英;;因明学简论[A];因明论文集[C];1980年
7 沈剑英;;略论因明的宗[A];因明论文集[C];1980年
8 石村;;因明二问[A];因明论文集[C];1980年
9 周文英;;隋唐时期因明的输入[A];因明论文集[C];1980年
10 吕o,
本文编号:2009823
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ljx/2009823.html