当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 逻辑论文 >

百年中国佛教量论因明学量式研究述评

发布时间:2018-06-28 11:23

  本文选题:佛教逻辑 + 量式 ; 参考:《贵州大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:百年来佛教量论因明学发展跌宕起伏,自1982年2月在北京召开抢救因明座谈会之后,“抢救因明遗产、推动因明发展”成了当前学术界的一项重要而急迫的任务。佛教量论因明学是当今汉传因明与藏传量论交融发展的结晶,“量式”更是研究量论因明学的核心内容。本文正是以百年中国佛教量论因明学的历史发展为背景,评述“量式”研究状况,从而梳理出当前对“量式”研究的热点和焦点问题,并对此进行了思考,希望对量式研究提供新思路。基于百年中国学界对佛教量论因明学的原典研究和原典研究之研究,笔者对“量式”进行了明确的划分,认为量式是在“量”的视域下所研究的“式”,是以量论为基础的语言表达范式,以“量式”为上位概念,“论式”和“法式”是下位概念,而“应成式”是“法式”的实际运用。通过对“论式”的研究,发现汉传因明的量式研究主要集中在“论式”,其中对陈那改革后的三支论式的评价最高,对成立三支论式的形式要求因三相的研究最为集中,然而对因三相和三支论式进行符号表达时,学界学者从不同的角度提供不同的论证,从而产生了诸多论诤。通过对“法式”、“应成式”的研究,发现藏传量论的量式研究集中在“法式”,因此,藏传量论对法称的体系更为推崇。而在这近百年的研究中,汉传因明与藏传量论交融发展,汉藏学者相互交流相互促进,“量式”背后庞大的量论因明学体系正是在这样的背景下逐渐清晰起来,“量式”在量论因明学中的功能正是在这样的认识论前提下显得尤为重要,量论因明学正是在“量式”的研究的基础上成了探求佛教认知模式之门的钥匙。
[Abstract]:Over the past hundred years, the development of the Buddhist theory of imminence has fluctuated. Since the forum on rescuing Yiming was held in Beijing in February 1982, "rescuing Yiming's heritage and promoting the development of Yiming" has become an important and urgent task in current academic circles. The theory of quantity and quantity of Buddhism is the crystallization of the blending and development of the theory of Han Dynasty and the theory of Tibetan quantity, and the form of quantity is the core of the study of the theory of quantity. Based on the historical development of the theory of quantity in Chinese Buddhism in the past 100 years, this paper reviews the research status of "quantitative style", thus sorting out the hot spots and focal issues in the study of "quantitative style", and thinking about it. It is hoped to provide new ideas for quantitative research. Based on the study of the original code and the original code of the theory of quantity in Buddhism in China for a hundred years, the author makes a clear distinction between the "quantitative form" and the "quantitative form", and holds that the quantitative form is the "form" studied in the field of "quantity". It is a linguistic expression paradigm based on quantity theory, in which "quantity" is the upper concept, "theory" and "French" are lower concepts, and "should form" is the practical application of "French". Through the study of the "theoretical style", it is found that the quantitative study of Han Zhuan's Yiming is mainly focused on the "argumentative style", in which the evaluation of the three-branch theory after Chen Na's reform is the highest, and the research on the form of establishing the three-branch theory is the most concentrated because of the three-phase research. However, when the three-phase and three-branch theory are expressed by symbols, scholars provide different arguments from different angles, resulting in a great deal of argumentation. Through the study of "French" and "should form", it is found that the quantitative study of the theory of Tibetan quantity is concentrated on "French", therefore, the theory of Tibetan quantity is more canonical to the system of legalization. In the past hundred years of research, the blending and development of Han Zhuan and the theory of Tibetan quantity, the exchanges and mutual promotion between Han and Tibetan scholars, the huge system of quantitative Invincialism behind the "quantitative pattern" has gradually become clear under such a background. The function of "quantitative type" in the study of quantitative theory of imminence is especially important under the premise of epistemology, which is the key to explore the cognitive model of Buddhism on the basis of the study of "quantitative mode".
【学位授予单位】:贵州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B81-092

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 沈海波;略论因明学史学上的若干问题[J];世界宗教研究;2004年03期

2 张晓翔;;首届国际因明学术研讨会概述[J];世界宗教研究;2006年03期

3 张忠义;;抢救绝学 发扬光大——首届国际因明学术研讨会综述[J];哲学动态;2006年09期

4 ;中国第三届因明学术研讨会在西宁召开[J];内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年04期

5 张忠义;刘纯;;因明风采 再现丝绸之路——中国第四届因明学术研讨会综述[J];哲学动态;2009年03期

6 思齐;;第六届全国因明学术研讨会在洛阳召开[J];中州学刊;2010年03期

7 ;第六届全国因明学学术研讨会[J];社会科学战线;2010年06期

8 张晓翔;;第七届全国因明学术研讨会综述[J];哲学动态;2012年02期

9 乐逸鸥;因明座谈会在北京召开[J];国内哲学动态;1982年06期

10 多识;;谈藏族对因明学的贡献[J];西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1992年01期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 刘培育;;因明三十四年[A];因明新探——首届因明学术讨论会论文集[C];1983年

2 波米·强巴洛卓;杨化群;宋晓嵇;;藏传因明的作用和基本内容——入因明学阶梯[A];因明研究[C];1990年

3 刘邦凡;唐歆;宋茜;;简论近代以来的我国因明教学[A];第一次南开逻辑学专业学人学术研讨会论文集[C];2012年

4 沈剑英;;因明学简论[A];全国逻辑讨论会论文选集[C];1979年

5 周文英;;因明在印度的发生和发展[A];因明论文集[C];1980年

6 沈剑英;;因明学简论[A];因明论文集[C];1980年

7 沈剑英;;略论因明的宗[A];因明论文集[C];1980年

8 石村;;因明二问[A];因明论文集[C];1980年

9 周文英;;隋唐时期因明的输入[A];因明论文集[C];1980年

10 吕o,

本文编号:2077831


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ljx/2077831.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户daa48***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com