经“可然”推“应然”
发布时间:2018-07-21 11:40
【摘要】:以往解决“休谟问题”的各种推导方法都不是普遍有效的。这启示我们 ,与其探索“实然”与“应然”间还无从定性的关系 ,不如从“应然”开始 ,探索蕴涵“应然问题”的必然前提。经分析 ,“应然问题”的充要条件是“可以这样做 ,也可以那样做”的“可然” ,而“实然”则只是部分“应然问题”的间接前提。在逻辑上我们可以做从“实然”到“应然”的推导 ,但在实践层面只适宜从需要解决的“应然问题”开始推导“应然”。这个推导过程的关键是“可然”到“应然”的过渡 ,基本方法是比较评价法
[Abstract]:In the past, all kinds of derivation methods to solve Hume problem are not universal and effective. This enlightens us that rather than exploring the uncertain relationship between "reality" and "ought", we should begin with "ought" and explore the inevitable premise of implying "ought to be". Through analysis, the necessary and sufficient condition of the "ought problem" is that "can be done in this way as well as in that way", while the "reality" is only the indirect premise of the "supposed problem". Logically, we can deduce from "real" to "ought", but in practice, we can only start with "ought" problem that needs to be solved. The key to this derivation process is the transition from "can" to "ought", and the basic method is the comparative evaluation method.
【作者单位】: 华中科技大学哲学系
【分类号】:B812
本文编号:2135408
[Abstract]:In the past, all kinds of derivation methods to solve Hume problem are not universal and effective. This enlightens us that rather than exploring the uncertain relationship between "reality" and "ought", we should begin with "ought" and explore the inevitable premise of implying "ought to be". Through analysis, the necessary and sufficient condition of the "ought problem" is that "can be done in this way as well as in that way", while the "reality" is only the indirect premise of the "supposed problem". Logically, we can deduce from "real" to "ought", but in practice, we can only start with "ought" problem that needs to be solved. The key to this derivation process is the transition from "can" to "ought", and the basic method is the comparative evaluation method.
【作者单位】: 华中科技大学哲学系
【分类号】:B812
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 龚群;哈贝马斯的社会真理观[J];哲学研究;1998年12期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 郑富兴;话语伦理学与学校道德教育[J];比较教育研究;2002年12期
2 韩东屏;实然·应然·可然——关于休谟问题的一种新思考[J];江汉论坛;2003年11期
3 李晓南;实践唯物主义真理观建构中的内外问题[J];云南行政学院学报;2003年02期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 李殿森;论课程知识的社会建构[D];西南大学;2006年
2 陈郭华;价值判断是不可证实的吗?[D];复旦大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 徐震;简论哈贝马斯对历史唯物主义的理解和改造[D];苏州大学;2003年
【相似文献】
相关会议论文 前1条
1 帖君;;双珠式图示[A];逻辑今探——中国逻辑学会第五次代表大会暨学术讨论会论文集[C];1996年
,本文编号:2135408
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ljx/2135408.html