芝诺悖论与秃头悖论比较研究
发布时间：2018-08-29 17:01
【摘要】：古希腊时代产生的芝诺悖论和秃头悖论,引发了哲学、逻辑、数学和物理等领域的学者们广泛而持久的讨论。学界对这两个悖论的研究往往是分开进行的,对它们之间的内在关联并未给予充分的关注。芝诺悖论旨在拒斥"动",秃头悖论意在否证"多",两者的共同旨归是要论证本体"be ing"的"静"和"一"的本质。这两个悖论所涉及的认知对象之潜无限和实无限的问题,至今仍是学界研究的难题。它们还同时涉及数学归纳法的合理性问题,即对认知对象的"质"进行归纳的方法能否适用于对"量"的归纳。以逻辑悖论的语用学性质重新审视这两个古老悖论,并作贯通研究,对于推进当代哲学认识论特别是对潜无限和实无限问题的认识,乃至于推动具体科学理论创新都具有重要的认知价值。
[Abstract]:The Zeno Paradox and the bald Paradox produced in ancient Greece have caused extensive and lasting discussions among scholars in philosophy, logic, mathematics and physics. The academic research on these two paradoxes is often carried out separately, and the internal relationship between them is not paid enough attention. The purpose of Zino paradox is to reject "movement" and baldness paradox is to prove "more". The common purport of both is to prove the essence of "quiet" and "one" of ontology "be ing". The problems of infinite and real infinite cognitive objects involved in these two paradoxes are still a difficult problem in academic circles. They also involve the rationality of mathematical induction, that is, whether the method of inducting the "quality" of the cognitive object can be applied to the induction of "quantity". By reviewing these two ancient paradoxes with the pragmatic nature of logical paradox and making a thorough study, we can understand the promotion of modern philosophical epistemology, especially the problem of potential infinity and real infinity. Even to promote the innovation of specific scientific theory has important cognitive value.
【作者单位】： 皖西学院政法系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目“广义逻辑悖论方法论与科学理论创新研究”(项目批准号:06JA720022) 安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目“逻辑悖论的应用研究”(项目批准号:2008sk266)成果之一
【分类号】：B81-09
[Abstract]:The Zeno Paradox and the bald Paradox produced in ancient Greece have caused extensive and lasting discussions among scholars in philosophy, logic, mathematics and physics. The academic research on these two paradoxes is often carried out separately, and the internal relationship between them is not paid enough attention. The purpose of Zino paradox is to reject "movement" and baldness paradox is to prove "more". The common purport of both is to prove the essence of "quiet" and "one" of ontology "be ing". The problems of infinite and real infinite cognitive objects involved in these two paradoxes are still a difficult problem in academic circles. They also involve the rationality of mathematical induction, that is, whether the method of inducting the "quality" of the cognitive object can be applied to the induction of "quantity". By reviewing these two ancient paradoxes with the pragmatic nature of logical paradox and making a thorough study, we can understand the promotion of modern philosophical epistemology, especially the problem of potential infinity and real infinity. Even to promote the innovation of specific scientific theory has important cognitive value.
【作者单位】： 皖西学院政法系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目“广义逻辑悖论方法论与科学理论创新研究”(项目批准号:06JA720022) 安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目“逻辑悖论的应用研究”(项目批准号:2008sk266)成果之一
【分类号】：B81-09
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 朱梧i，
本文编号：2211839
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ljx/2211839.html
