国外邓小平理论研究若干热点问题评析

发布时间:2018-04-06 23:21

  本文选题:邓小平理论 切入点:国外研究 出处:《南京大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:国外邓小平理论研究已有30多年的时间,在一些问题上学者们的讨论十分激烈。本文选择了三个热点问题进行研究,包括邓小平理论与毛泽东思想的关系、邓小平的改革开放思想以及邓小平的哲学方法论。在这之前,先是大体介绍了国外邓小平理论研究的总体情况,按照时间顺序进行了简单的梳理和分期。对于核心的三个问题,本文首先详细介绍了每个问题上国外不同的观点,并将这些观点进行了笼统的分类,然后立足于邓小平理论文本,采用马克思主义的研究方法,对国外学者的观点进行了分析和评价。具体章节如下:引论简要介绍国外邓小平理论研究的概况;本文选题的意义;本文的研究方法以及创新之处。第一章国外学者论邓小平理论和毛泽东思想的关系。在这一问题上介绍了两种不同的观点:一是“对立论”,认为两类理论是对立的关系,邓小平理论是对毛泽东思想的修正与背弃;二是“一致论”,这种观点和国内的主流看法一致,都认为邓小平继承了毛泽东思想的理论精髓,并结合具体的时代对其加以延伸和发展。章节末尾本文对以上两种观点进行了评析,结合邓小平文本的实际以及特定的时代背景指出了对立论的错误之处。第二章国外学者对邓小平改革开放思想的研究。这一部分的研究又可以分为经济类和政治类。经济类是指国外学者对于邓小平经济理论的研究,本文列举了一些代表学者的观点,主要包括“中国特色的社会主义”和“西化的资本主义”两类观点;政治类是指国外学者对于邓小平政治改革思想的研究,研究的焦点在于邓小平是否重视政治体制改革以及政治体制改革的方向。同样,章节末尾本文对国外学者在这一块问题上的观点进行了总结性的分析和批判。第三章国外学者论邓小平的哲学方法论。在这一问题上国外学者主要有两种观点,一种是把邓小平的哲学方法论概括为“实事求是”,另一种则认为是“实用主义”。前者强调邓小平理论根本上仍然坚持马克思主义的立场和社会主义的性质,只是根据时代发展的变化适时调整相关主张和政策。后者则声称邓小平理论是无原则的实用主义,完全根据外界情况的变化作出变化。本文正面阐述了邓小平理论的精髓,指出实事求是在邓小平理论中的体现,批驳了实用主义者的观点。第四章结束语。本章是总结性的章节,回顾了国外邓小平理论研究中的三个热点问题,并简要地做出了正面的回答,阐释了邓小平理论和毛泽东思想之间的关系、邓小平改革开放理论的实质以及邓小平理论实事求是的哲学方法论。本章最后对国外学者研究中的问题进行了总体的批判。
[Abstract]:Deng Xiaoping's theory has been studied for more than 30 years in foreign countries.This paper chooses three hot issues to study, including the relationship between Deng Xiaoping's theory and Mao Zedong's thought, Deng Xiaoping's thought of reform and opening up and the philosophical methodology of Deng Xiaoping.Before this, first introduced the foreign Deng Xiaoping theory research general situation, according to the time sequence has carried on the simple combing and the stage.For the three core questions, this paper firstly introduces the different viewpoints of foreign countries on each issue in detail, and classifies these views in general, then based on Deng Xiaoping's theoretical text, adopts the Marxist research method.The views of foreign scholars are analyzed and evaluated.The specific chapters are as follows: the introduction briefly introduces the general situation of Deng Xiaoping's theoretical research abroad; the significance of this topic; the research methods and innovations of this paper.The first chapter discusses the relationship between Deng Xiaoping's theory and Mao Zedong's thought by foreign scholars.On this issue, two different viewpoints are introduced: one is "opposites", the other is that the two kinds of theories are opposites, Deng Xiaoping's theory is a revision and reneging on Mao Zedong's thought, the other is "consensus theory".This view is consistent with the mainstream view in China, and Deng Xiaoping inherits the theoretical essence of Mao Zedong's thought, and extends and develops it in combination with the specific times.At the end of the chapter, this paper comments on the above two viewpoints, and points out the mistakes of the argument in combination with the reality of Deng Xiaoping's text and the specific background of the times.The second chapter is the study of Deng Xiaoping's reform and opening-up thought by foreign scholars.This part of the study can be divided into economic and political categories.The economic category refers to the study of Deng Xiaoping's economic theory by foreign scholars. This paper enumerates the views of some representative scholars, mainly including "socialism with Chinese characteristics" and "westernized capitalism".The political category refers to the study of Deng Xiaoping's political reform thought by foreign scholars. The focus of the research is whether Deng Xiaoping attaches importance to the political system reform and the direction of political system reform.At the end of the chapter, the author analyzes and criticizes the views of foreign scholars on this issue.Chapter three discusses Deng Xiaoping's philosophical methodology by foreign scholars.On this issue, foreign scholars have two main views, one is to generalize Deng Xiaoping's philosophical methodology as "seeking truth from facts", the other is "pragmatism".The former emphasizes that Deng Xiaoping still insists on the position of Marxism and the nature of socialism, but adjusts the relevant opinions and policies according to the development of the times.The latter claims that Deng Xiaoping's theory is unprincipled pragmatism, completely based on changes in external circumstances.This paper expounds the quintessence of Deng Xiaoping's theory and points out that the embodiment of seeking truth from facts in Deng Xiaoping's theory refutes the viewpoint of pragmatists.Chapter four: conclusion.This chapter is a summative chapter. It reviews three hot issues in the theoretical research of Deng Xiaoping abroad, and gives a brief positive answer, explaining the relationship between Deng Xiaoping's theory and Mao Zedong's thought.The essence of Deng Xiaoping's theory of reform and opening up and the philosophical methodology of Deng Xiaoping's theory of seeking truth from facts.At the end of this chapter, the author makes a general critique of the problems in the research of foreign scholars.
【学位授予单位】:南京大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:A849

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前7条

1 柴尚金;;对当前世界社会主义运动三大热点问题的看法[J];当代世界与社会主义;2009年02期

2 万晴雪,郑飙;燃油争议热点问题分析及最新案例介绍[J];中国海商法年刊;2003年00期

3 张珂;李亚楠;;“80后”、“90后”群体对若干热点问题认识差异的对比研究——以重庆部分高校为例[J];山西青年管理干部学院学报;2011年04期

4 李新市;;环境友好型社会建设中需要解决好的几个热点问题[J];大连干部学刊;2008年10期

5 宫少朋;信息不确定条件下的外交调研——从突发事件和热点问题的调研说起[J];外交学院学报;2001年04期

6 徐占权;对土地革命战争史研究中几个热点问题的看法[J];军事历史;2002年04期

7 ;[J];;年期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 吴兵;国外邓小平理论研究若干热点问题评析[D];南京大学;2015年



本文编号:1719375

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/1719375.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c3cd5***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com