新历史理性实践叙事逻辑的正当性何以可能——观念史视野内《德意志意识形态》哲学正题识辨

发布时间：2019-03-06 15:55

【摘要】：马克思恩格斯基于实践人学意义上的历史性价值思维智慧,基于现实个体之自我生成、自主实现逻辑,将对历史进行哲学认识的前提置于"现实的个人的存在"及其"物质生产实践活动"基础之上以后,其所致力于呈现的唯物主义历史观,就在一定程度上摆脱了纯粹理念意义上有关"人类解放的宏大叙事",实现了对"历史主义"与旧的"历史哲学"观念的藩篱的实质性超越,从而使文明人类获得并确证了一种实践的"历史性"观念的合理性出场逻辑。马克思恩格斯的努力表明,如果说历史的发展和进步的结果,是创造这一历史、推动这一历史的主体的命运变得越来越悲惨,真实的历史主体愈来愈受自己所创造的东西所束缚和奴役,那么,这种历史一定是成问题的。属人的历史和人属的历史,一定是通过人自己直接的感性的物质实践活动自主造成、自为拥有的,除此以外,关于历史本体、认识论基础以及价值的任何理解和解释,都是有违历史真实的。
[Abstract]:Marx and Engels are based on the thinking wisdom of historical value in the sense of practical humanity, on the basis of the self-generation of real individuals, and on the logic of self-realization. After putting the premise of philosophical understanding of history on the basis of "the existence of realistic individuals" and its "practical activities of material production", he devoted himself to presenting the materialistic view of history. To a certain extent, it got rid of the "grand narrative of human liberation" in the sense of pure philosophy, and realized the substantial transcendence of the barriers between "historicism" and the old "philosophy of history". Thus, civilized human beings obtain and confirm the rationality of the concept of "historical" in practice. Marx and Engels' efforts show that if the development and progress of history is the result of the creation of this history, the fate of the main body of this history has become more and more tragic. Real historical subjects are more and more bound and enslaved by what they create, so this history must be problematic. The history of human beings and the history of human beings must be caused by their own direct perceptual material practice activities of their own, with the exception of any understanding and interpretation of historical Noumenon, epistemological basis, and value, It is against the historical truth.
【作者单位】：陕西师范大学政治经济学院;陕西师范大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：A811

【参考文献】