论甘棠港道的开辟与福州丝路的畅达
发布时间:2018-04-06 21:09
本文选题:甘棠港 切入点:三山志 出处:《福建史志》2015年03期
【摘要】:正对于福州甘棠港的研究,至今仍是热议的话题,可见其意义。今时再论,似乎较前深入一些,却依然难有共识。究其原因,除了时隔太久、资料缺乏之外,笔者以为也有对资料解读的问题,看来还有深入探讨的必要。首先,自然是对宋淳熙《三山志》记载的认识与解读。众所周知,《三山志》是南宋状元、宰相梁克家主持编修的,有些内容出自他的手笔。《宋史》本传评价梁克家,为人"风度峻整","为文浑厚明白,辞命尤温雅"。《三山志》作为古代名
[Abstract]:The research on Fuzhou Gantang Port is still a hot topic, and its significance can be seen.At this time, it seems to be deeper than before, but it is still difficult to reach a consensus.The reason is that apart from too long time and lack of data, the author thinks that there is also the problem of interpretation of the data, it seems that there is a need for further discussion.First of all, the understanding and interpretation of Song Chunxi's three Mountains Records.As we all know, "San Shan Zhi" was compiled and edited by the leader of the Southern Song Dynasty, the prime minister Liang Kejia, and some of the contents were written by him.Quoting the words "you are gentle". "San Shan Zhi" as an ancient name
【作者单位】: 福建省文史馆;
【分类号】:K925.7
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 廖大珂;;甘棠港的位置及其兴衰初探[J];南洋问题研究;1993年03期
2 廖大珂;;闽国“甘棠港”考[J];福建学刊;1988年05期
3 林汀水;也谈甘棠港与黄崎镇的位置[J];中国社会经济史研究;1995年03期
4 王铁藩;唐末开辟的甘棠港址考[J];福建论坛(文史哲版);1984年05期
5 廖大珂;再论“甘棠港”的历史问题[J];中国社会经济史研究;1998年03期
6 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 郑望 张志强;从港口茶埠到海西茶都[N];闽东日报;2010年
,本文编号:1718909
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/renwendili/1718909.html