历代注疏对《楚辞》地名解说的讹变——以“三危”为例

发布时间：2018-04-06 20:21

本文选题：楚辞　切入点：天问　出处：《社会科学研究》2013年05期

【摘要】：先秦时代,由于总体上尚未脱离浪漫幻想的神话时代,故典籍所载名物多有迂怪恍惚、飘渺流离的特点。承袭这一历史特征,同时又独具南方地域文化特色的《楚辞》则更是如此,《楚辞》中所载众多具有神话幻想特质的地理名称便是其重要例子。然而在后世各家的注疏解说过程中,对于这些神话的、幻想的、飘渺的名物称谓却总体上采取一种具体化、实证化、明确化的阐释策略,从而最终逐渐远离先秦文献原典的源初性意义。本文拈出《楚辞·天问》地理名词"三危",以个案研究的方式,具体探讨其语义阐释的讹变历程。
[Abstract]:In the pre-Qin period, since the mythical era of romantic fantasy has not been separated from the whole, the classic books contain the characteristics of strange trance and ethereal drift.This is especially true of Chu ci, which inherits this historical feature and has unique regional and cultural characteristics in the South. The many geographical names with mythological fantasies contained in Chu ci are an important example.However, in the process of annotation and interpretation of later generations, the appellations of these mythical, fantasy and ethereal names, on the whole, adopt a specific, empirical and explicit explanation strategy.Finally, it is far away from the origin and significance of the original literature of the pre-Qin Dynasty.This paper comes up with the geographical term "three dangers", and discusses the process of its semantic interpretation by case study.
【作者单位】：四川师范大学国际教育学院;四川师范大学巴蜀文化研究中心;四川大学文学与新闻传播学院博士后流动站;
【基金】：四川省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划2010年度基地项目“屈辞外来地名与巴蜀文化”(SC10E041)
【分类号】：I206.2;K928.6

【参考文献】