“反向格义”与中国地理学史研究

发布时间：2018-04-30 15:55

本文选题：反向格义 + 中国地理学史　；参考：《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学版)》2009年02期

【摘要】：现代中国地理学史研究始于王庸于20世纪30年代撰写的《中国地理学史》,此后,侯仁之于60年代主编了《中国古代地理学简史》,中国科学院自然科学史研究所地学史组于80年代编写了《中国古代地理学史》,其间虽然还有其他相关书籍问世,但上述三部风格迥异的地理学史著作更具典型性,从中可以看到在对中国古代地理学的反思建构中,西方现代地理学观念的影响。重视自然地理,重视古代地理知识的科学性,是这些地理学史研究的重要倾向。而具有这种倾向的诠释,却偏离了中国古代地理学体系的某些主要特征。由此我们也可以反思"反向格义"问题在中国地理学史研究中的特殊的存在形式。当我们对这一问题有所自觉时,更应该意识到中国古代地理学,作为一套成熟的学术体系,乃是以王朝社会的发展为基础和主要关照对象的。
[Abstract]:The study of the history of modern Chinese geography began in the History of Chinese Geography written by Wang Yong in the 1930s. Hou Renzhi edited the brief History of Ancient Chinese Geography in the 1960s, and the Geography History Group of the Institute of Natural Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences compiled the History of Ancient Chinese Geography in the 1980s. However, the three works on geography history with different styles are more typical, from which we can see the influence of the western modern geography concept in the reflection and construction of ancient Chinese geography. Paying attention to natural geography and the scientific nature of ancient geographical knowledge is an important tendency in the study of the history of geography. The interpretation with this tendency deviates from some main features of ancient Chinese geography system. Therefore, we can also reflect on the special forms of existence of the problem of reverse Geography in the study of Chinese history of geography. When we are conscious of this problem, we should realize that ancient Chinese geography, as a set of mature academic system, is based on the development of dynasty society and is the main concern object.
【作者单位】：北京大学历史地理研究中心;
【分类号】：P90;K90

【共引文献】