顾炎武地理考据得失论——纪念顾炎武诞辰四百周年

发布时间：2018-04-30 16:52

本文选题：评论 + 顾炎武　；参考：《中国历史地理论丛》2013年04期

【摘要】：作者提出研究清代地理考据的理念,是应深入到清儒熟稔的学术领域中去,一一检验其考证之是或非,从而得出实实在在的结论。本文以《日知录》为主,探讨了顾炎武在政区沿革、地名用字、地名读音、异地同名、地理方位、地名定位、地理辨误等方面的学术贡献,认为他在沿革地理领域的独立见解颇具学术价值,而顾炎武指出十处《明一统志》之误在客观上开启了批评《明一统志》之风。同时,作者也考辨了顾炎武两类失误,一是唐代领县过十之州,顾炎武认为只有八个,却遗漏了六个;顾炎武关于府制的议论,居然发生四处错误,从而认为评价顾炎武既不可过于苛求,但也不可拔高。
[Abstract]:The author puts forward the idea of studying geographical textual research in the Qing Dynasty, which is to go deep into the academic field which is familiar with the Qing Confucianism, to examine whether the textual research is true or not, and to draw a real conclusion. This paper discusses the academic contributions of Gu Yanwu in the evolution of administrative district, the use of characters for place names, the pronunciation of place names, the name of the same name, the geographical location, the location of geographical names, the identification of geographical errors, and so on. He thinks that his independent opinion in the field of evolution geography is of academic value, while Gu Yanwu points out that the mistakes of ten "Ming and one Zhi" have objectively opened up the trend of criticism. At the same time, the author has also examined and identified two kinds of mistakes made by Gu Yanwu. First, Gu Yanwu thought that there were only eight states and missed six of the ten counties in the Tang Dynasty. Gu Yanwu's argument about the government system actually made four mistakes. So that the evaluation of Gu Yanwu can not be too demanding, but also can not be exalted.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学清史研究所;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目《清史地图集》(批准号:12&ZD146,主持人:华林甫)阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：K928.6

【参考文献】