历史上的灵洲、灵州、灵武谷、灵武城址及其他——订正《中国历史地图集》的一个错误

发布时间：2018-07-03 16:41

本文选题：灵洲 + 灵州　；参考：《宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2008年01期

【摘要】：《中国历史地图集》于1975年由中华地图学社出版。虽然在普及历史地理知识、方便教学研究等方面起到了不可低估的作用,但由于受到当时科研水平的限制,很多历史地理的疑案、悬案并未得到彻底解决。尤其是关于明代以前的灵洲、灵州、灵武谷(口)、灵武的地址方位,有明显的错误。这是不能苛求于前人的。近年来,宁夏学术界在这方面开展了深入研究,取得了丰硕成果。笔者依据近年在宁夏吴忠市新出土的重要文物及宁夏学术界的研究成果,用考古发现—文献记载—民间口碑资料—现场勘察的连环证据,考证出自西汉至明初灵洲、灵州、灵武谷(口)、灵武的确址及沿革,证明了《中国历史地图集》(以及《中国历史大辞典》等工具书)在这个问题上的失误,同时,又就失误的原因提出了自己的观点。
[Abstract]:The Atlas of Chinese History was published by the Chinese Cartographic Society in 1975. Although it has played an important role in popularizing the knowledge of historical geography and facilitating teaching and research, due to the limitation of scientific research level at that time, many historical geography cases have not been solved thoroughly. Especially about the Ming Dynasty Lingzhou, Lingzhou, Lingwu Valley (mouth), Lingwu address location, there are obvious errors. This cannot be imposed upon our predecessors. In recent years, Ningxia academic circles in this area carried out in-depth research, and achieved fruitful results. Based on the important cultural relics unearthed in recent years in Wuzhong City of Ningxia and the research results of the academic circles in Ningxia, the author uses the serial evidence of archaeological discovery, documentary record, folk word of mouth data and field investigation to prove that the cultural relics are from the Western Han Dynasty to the early Ming Dynasty in Lingzhou, Lingzhou, and Lingzhou. Lingwu Valley (mouth), Lingwu site and its evolution prove the mistakes of the Chinese Historical Atlas (and reference books such as the Great Dictionary of Chinese History) on this issue, and at the same time, put forward their own views on the causes of the mistakes.
【作者单位】：吴忠市人大常委会
【分类号】：K901.9

【共引文献】