“理性”与“感性”之间:上海流动人口迁居意愿研究
发布时间:2018-02-17 01:39
本文关键词: 流动人口 居住迁居 居住意愿 再流动 上海 出处:《现代城市研究》2017年07期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:中国大城市已进入"移民城市"时代,提升流动人口居住意愿对保持城市发展活力具有重要意义。对上海流动人口的迁居意愿与再流动意向进行研究,并采用Logistic回归分析方法探讨影响机制。研究发现,在当前"城乡二元结构"与"城市内部二元结构"下,大量流动人口处于幸福感低但定居意愿强的状况。在再流动地的选择上,返乡是流动人口再流动的主要选择。在影响机制上,家庭收入高、拥有住房、家庭成员共同生活的流动人口定居意愿较强,而经济收入低、租赁住房、家庭成员离散的流动人口迁居意愿较强,且流动人口定居行为呈现出明显的"居住惯性"。在流动人口再流动意向上,呈现出受教育水平越高、家庭负担越小,继续向其他城市流动的可能性越大,而年龄越大、家乡发展环境越好则返乡的可能性越高。在"十三五"发展期,建议尽快将长期定居城市但发展能力弱的流动人口及其家庭纳入城市福利保障体系之中,减少流动人口入户的"选择性歧视"。
[Abstract]:China's big cities have entered the era of "immigrant cities". It is of great significance to improve the living willingness of floating population in order to maintain the vitality of urban development. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the influence mechanism. The study found that under the current "urban-rural dual structure" and "urban internal dual structure", A large number of the floating population are in a situation of low happiness but strong willingness to settle. In the choice of refloating places, returning home is the main choice for the reflow of the floating population. In terms of the influence mechanism, the family income is high, and they own housing. The floating population with family members living together is more willing to settle down, while the migrant population with low economic income, rental housing and separated family members are more willing to move. And the settlement behavior of the floating population shows obvious "residence inertia". The higher the education level, the smaller the family burden, and the more likely the floating population will continue to move to other cities, and the older the floating population is, The better the development environment in your hometown, the higher the possibility of returning home. During the 13th Five-Year Plan development period, it was suggested that the floating population and their families, who had settled in cities for a long time but had weak development capabilities, should be included in the urban welfare security system as soon as possible. Reduce the "selective discrimination" of floating population entering the household.
【作者单位】: 东南大学建筑学院;东南大学城乡规划与经济社会发展研究中心;江苏省城市经济学会;中山大学地理科学与规划学院;中国城市规划学会;武汉大学城市设计学院;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金项目(41320104001,41422103,41501151) 东南大学重大科学研究引导基金“弱势群体与城乡空间公平共享”(编号:2242017S30004);东南大学江苏首批高端智库基地配套项目资助
【分类号】:C912.6;C922
,
本文编号:1516918
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/1516918.html