国家哲学社会科学基金后期资助项目评价体系分析

发布时间：2018-03-20 00:02

  本文选题：图书评价后期资助　切入点：　出处：《西南民族大学学报(人文社科版)》2016年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：人文社科类学术成果不同于自然科学,其表现形式更加多样,研究周期相对较长,评价方式更加复杂。目前对于人文社科类的期刊评价,因为期刊具有较强的出版周期固定,数量较少等因素,研究相对成熟;而对于学术图书,由于图书发行量大且出版周期不固定等因素,评价体系的构建仍值得进一步讨论。希望对后期资助项目的学术成果的评价实践,能够对图书评价体系的构建做出一些有益的补充。
[Abstract]:The academic achievements of humanities and social sciences are different from those of natural sciences, their forms of expression are more diverse, the research period is relatively long, and the evaluation methods are more complicated. For academic books, due to the large circulation of books and the indefinite publication cycle, the number of such factors is relatively mature. The construction of the evaluation system is still worth further discussion. It is hoped that the evaluation practice of the academic achievements of the later funded projects can make some beneficial additions to the construction of the book evaluation system.
【作者单位】： 南京大学信息管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金特别委托项目“国家社科基金项目成果学术影响力评估”(14@ZH051)阶段性成果
【分类号】：C12
，

本文编号：1636590