国际问题研究范式探讨:以日本研究为例

发布时间：2018-04-02 16:13

本文选题：国际问题研究　切入点：日本研究　出处：《日本学刊》2016年06期

【摘要】：西方的社会科学研究有三个国际问题研究范式。人类学文化与人格学派受整体主义影响,从整体来把握人,利用心理分析的视角研究日本,较好解释并预测了日本的国家行为,但后来的发展受到弗洛伊德人格心理学的制约。地区研究是基于还原主义思想把社会区分成不同部分,强调通过跨学科合作,把不同专业的知识整合起来,但如何把部分整合成整体的学问仍然困扰着研究人员。国际关系理论是预设国家行为体的属性相同,探讨国际体系对行为体的影响,有化约主义的影子,但从日本的例子来看,除非国家失去独特的文化特性,否则其学说很难有解释力。整体主义形成的范式更符合人存在的本质,未来在从事国际问题研究上可能有较大发挥空间。
[Abstract]:There are three international research paradigms in western social science research.Influenced by collectivism, anthropological culture and personality school grasps people from the holistic perspective, studies Japan from the perspective of psychoanalysis, and better explains and predicts the national behavior of Japan, but its later development is restricted by Freud's personality psychology.Regional research is based on reductionism to divide society into different parts, emphasizing interdisciplinary cooperation, integrating different professional knowledge, but how to integrate part into a whole knowledge still puzzles the researchers.The theory of international relations is that the attribute of the state actors is the same, the influence of the international system on the actors has the shadow of reductionism, but in the case of Japan, unless the country loses its unique cultural identity,Otherwise, its theory is difficult to explain.The paradigm formed by holism is more in line with the essence of human existence, and there may be more room for future research on international issues.
【作者单位】：华侨大学国际关系学院;
【基金】：2015年华侨大学华侨华人研究专项课题“华侨华人在中日韩关系发展中的地位研究(1992—2014)”(编号:HQHRZD2015-04)
【分类号】：C131.3

【相似文献】