“认同理论”视角下民族大学生情感支持影响因素的实证研究
发布时间:2018-04-10 13:47
本文选题:承诺 + 认同 ; 参考:《中国社会科学院研究生院》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:现代社会是复杂与多面的镶嵌结构,自我为了协调与这样的社会的相互作用,拥有多种角色,并对不同的角色具有不同的认同。族群认同是个人拥有的多重社会认同的重要形式之一,体现着个人对特定族群的信念、态度、参与行为以及对其族群身份的承认和认可,具有强大的行为驱动力。它的强弱不仅促进或制约着个人的行为、决定着族群内部凝聚性的大小,也关系着不同族群之间的交往与沟通,影响着族群乃至整个和谐社会的建立和良性运转。本文遵从斯特赖克的“认同理论”,在承诺-认同-行为的框架下,以中国国家青年社科基金项目《西北民族地区穆斯林大学生族群认同的群际行为模式与网络化影响研究》所获得的3703份问卷调查资料为基础,运用结构方程模型对中国西北民族地区高校大学生群体寻求情感支持的族群偏好行为的影响路径与因素进行了实证分析,在一定程度上检验了斯特赖克的“认同理论”在中国西北民族地区高校大学生群体中的适应性。研究表明:反映交友结构的承诺与个体拥有的族群认同对民族大学生的交友的族群偏好产生影响,民族大学生在进行寻求情感支持时,是存在族群偏好的。民族大学生情感支持网承诺对于族群偏好的影响存在直接与间接两条路径。围绕个人角色形成的社会结构决定了人们的交往模式,无论受访者的民族是什么,人们对其族群粘性越大,其越倾向和同族的人诉说心事。同时,无论是汉族还是少数民族大学生,其情感支持核心朋友网的承诺都对其倾诉行为的族群偏好有影响,但不同之处在于,对于少数民族大学生群体,这种朋友关系偏好的“结构决定论”更强,因果关系更加明显。本研究的一个值得讨论的发现在于:无论汉族还是少数民族大学生,其情感支持核心网的承诺依然是决定他们择友族群偏好的关键因素,族群认同作为一个十分重要的中介变量虽有一定影响,但其作用并不像斯特赖克的“认同理论”中描述的那样重要。
[Abstract]:Modern society is a complex and multi-faceted inlaid structure. In order to coordinate the interaction with such a society, the ego has a variety of roles and different recognition of different roles.Ethnic identity is one of the important forms of multiple social identity owned by individuals. It embodies the belief attitude participation behavior and recognition and recognition of the ethnic identity of a particular ethnic group and has a strong behavioral driving force.Its strength and weakness not only promote or restrict individual behavior, determine the size of cohesion within ethnic groups, but also affect the communication and communication between different ethnic groups, and affect the establishment and healthy operation of ethnic groups and even the whole harmonious society.This paper follows Stryker's "identity theory", under the framework of commitment-identity-behavior,Based on 3703 questionnaires obtained from the National Youth Social Science Foundation of China, "Research on the intergroup behavior pattern and Network impact of Muslim College students' ethnic identity in Northwest ethnic areas",By using the structural equation model, this paper makes an empirical analysis on the influence path and factors of the ethnic preference behavior of college students seeking emotional support in the northwest ethnic minority area of China.To some extent, it tests the adaptability of Stryker's "identity theory" to the college students in Northwest China.The research shows that the commitment to reflect the structure of making friends and the ethnic identity owned by the individual have an impact on the ethnic preference of ethnic college students, and ethnic preference exists in the process of seeking emotional support for ethnic college students.There are direct and indirect ways for ethnic college students' emotional support network commitment to affect ethnic preference.The social structure formed around the personal role determines the communication pattern of people. No matter what the nationality of the interviewees, the greater the stickiness of the interviewees, the more inclined they are to tell their feelings with the people of the same race.At the same time, whether Han or minority college students, the commitment of their emotional support core friends network has an impact on the ethnic preferences of their confiding behavior, but the difference is that, for minority college students,This kind of friend relation preference "structure determinism" is stronger, the causality is more obvious.One of the findings worth discussing in this study is that the commitment of emotional support core network is still the key factor to determine the preference of the ethnic groups of Han and ethnic minorities.Although ethnic identity is a very important intermediate variable, its function is not as important as that described in Stryker's identity Theory.
【学位授予单位】:中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:C912.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李忠路;邱泽奇;;家庭背景如何影响儿童学业成就?——义务教育阶段家庭社会经济地位影响差异分析[J];社会学研究;2016年04期
2 姜术容;;论群际接触理论的核心:过失无知抑或其他——兼与陈晶、佐斌教授商榷[J];民族论坛;2015年10期
3 谷建杰;李凤兰;董虹媛;孟琪;;群际接触理论视角下民汉大学生混合住宿模式探讨[J];学校党建与思想教育;2014年08期
4 严鸣;涂红伟;李骥;;认同理论视角下新员工组织社会化的定义及结构维度[J];心理科学进展;2011年05期
5 吴作富;;社会心理学视野下的两种认同理论:整合抑或分立?[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2010年05期
6 赵静;王莉萍;;认同的三种理论取向概述[J];牡丹江大学学报;2009年12期
7 覃乃昌;;从族群认同走向民族认同——20世纪中后期广西的民族识别研究之三[J];广西民族研究;2009年03期
8 王歆;;认同理论的起源、发展与评述[J];新疆社科论坛;2009年02期
9 周晓虹;;认同理论:社会学与心理学的分析路径[J];社会科学;2008年04期
10 万明钢;王舟;;族群认同、族群认同的发展及测定与研究方法[J];世界民族;2007年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 李秀勤;我国全日制专业学位研究生角色认同研究[D];西南大学;2012年
,本文编号:1731448
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/1731448.html