仪式重构与村落整合——以烟台市北头村祠堂修缮为例

发布时间：2018-05-01 08:20

本文选题：仪式重构 + “形式化”整合　；参考：《山东社会科学》2017年03期

【摘要】：文章试图通过祠堂修缮的个例,来分析传统仪式的重构与村落整合之间的关系。祠堂具有宗教性与宗族性的双重属性,也因而被视为村落中最具整合意义的象征符号。但是在北头村,外出精英运作下的祠堂修缮活动,对村落整合所发挥的作用却是"形式化"的。这一仪式的重构虽是祭祖场所之修复与宗族血脉之续修,但是其村落整合的意义更侧重于"外联性"而非"内聚性"。同宗同源的概念逐渐成为了宗族成员,尤其是村落、外出精英、外地宗亲,甚至外部社会四者相互之间建构外联关系的社会资本,而个人与宗族之间的内联性却有所缺失。分析其原因,是因为在传统仪式重构的过程中,缺少神化祖先的过程,忽略了祠堂禁忌,导致祠堂的宗教性因素被不断抽离、弱化,从而难以维持其社会整合的功能。可以说,祠堂的神圣意义被逐渐世俗化,传统被视为一种社会资本而被人们选择性地利用。
[Abstract]:This paper attempts to analyze the relationship between the reconstruction of traditional rituals and village integration through the examples of the restoration of ancestral halls. Ancestral temple has the dual attributes of religion and clan, so it is regarded as the most integrated symbol in the village. However, in Beitou Village, the restoration of ancestral halls under the operation of the outside elite is formalized. Although the reconstruction of this ritual is the restoration of ancestral sites and the continuation of clan blood, the significance of village integration is more "outreach" than "cohesion". The concept of homology has gradually become the social capital for the members of the clan, especially the village, the outsider elite, the non-native clan and even the outside society, to construct the external relations among them, but the inline between the individual and the clan is lacking. The reason is that in the process of traditional ritual reconstruction, the process of deification of ancestors is lacking, and the taboos of ancestral temples are ignored, which leads to the religious factors of ancestral temples being constantly withdrawn and weakened, thus it is difficult to maintain its function of social integration. It can be said that the sacred meaning of ancestral temple is gradually secularized, and tradition is regarded as a social capital and used selectively.
【作者单位】：山东大学哲学与社会发展学院;
【分类号】：C912.82

【参考文献】