当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 社会学论文 >

恋爱主观感受量表(RPUS)的编制研究

发布时间:2018-05-06 23:22

  本文选题:恋爱主观感受 + 恋爱质量 ; 参考:《郑州大学》2013年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的编制用于评价恋爱关系质量的工具,为恋爱关系的评价和指导提供科学依据,探索提高当代青年恋爱质量的影响因素与机制。 方法首先,采用文献分析法,构建恋爱主观感受的理论模型,确定恋爱质量的操作性定义与评价指标,形成恋爱主观感受评价条目,根据小样本预测验的统计结果删改题目,形成了“恋爱主观感受量表初试版”;其次,使用初始问卷进行和中国七因素人格量表以及亲密关系经历量表对全国1420名被试进行测评,通过项目分析和因素分析对问卷结构进行考察,形成了结构良好的“恋爱主观感受量表”,使用SPSS18.0进行统计分析。 结果(1)经因素分析结果表明恋爱主观感受量表包含成长性、满意感、冲突感、对等性4个因素,4个因素解释总方差的56.90%。(2)量表各因素的内部一致性系数在0.596~0.910之间,总量表的内部一致性系数为0.839;量表各因素的分半信度在0.535~0.876之间,总量表的分半信度系数为0.850。(3)恋爱主观感受量表总分及各维度分与亲密关系质量指数存在显著相关(p0.001)。(4)恋爱质量在不同年龄组之间、不同恋爱时间组之间、不同恋爱次数组之间都存在显著差异(p0.01,p0.001),在不同性别之间、是否异地恋之间得分不存在显著差异。(5)恋爱主观感受量表的总分及各维度与人格特质的情绪性、开创性、坚持性、德性、外向性、宜人性之间均存在相关;恋爱主观感受的冲突感与依恋焦虑存在显著正相关(p0.001)。 结论(1)恋爱主观感受量表(RPUS)结构合理,信、效度良好,各种指标符合测量学要求。(2)在恋爱关系中,两性在恋爱主观感受上无差异;是否异地恋之间在恋爱主观感受上无差异;相比之下,年龄越大恋爱质量越高,恋爱时间越长恋爱质量越高,恋爱次数越多恋爱质量越低。(3)个体的情绪性人格特质对恋爱质量具有破坏作用;而坚持性、开创性、外向性、德性和宜人性人格特质对恋爱质量具有促进作用;恋爱冲突感与依恋焦虑之间有内在的联系。
[Abstract]:Objective to develop a tool to evaluate the quality of love relationship, to provide scientific basis for the evaluation and guidance of love relationship, and to explore the influencing factors and mechanism of improving the quality of love among contemporary youth. Methods first of all, the theoretical model of subjective feeling of love was constructed by using literature analysis method, the operational definition and evaluation index of quality of love were determined, and the evaluation items of subjective feeling of love were formed, and the subject was deleted according to the statistical results of small sample prediction. The first version of the subjective feelings of Love scale was formed. Secondly, 1420 subjects in China were tested with the initial questionnaire, the Chinese Seven factors Personality scale and the intimate relationship experience scale. The questionnaire structure was investigated by item analysis and factor analysis, and a well-structured subjective feeling scale for Love was formed. The questionnaire was statistically analyzed with SPSS18.0. Results 1) the results of factor analysis showed that the subjective feeling scale of love included four factors: growth, satisfaction, conflict, equivalence, and the internal consistency coefficient of the four factors explaining the total variance was between 0.596 and 0.910. The internal consistency coefficient of the total scale is 0.839, the split-half reliability of each factor of the scale is between 0.535 and 0.876, The split-half reliability coefficient of the total scale was 0.850.3.The total score of subjective feeling scale and the scores of each dimension were significantly correlated with the closeness quality index (p 0.001). The quality of love was between different age groups and different love time groups. There was significant difference between different groups of love times (p 0.01). There was no significant difference in the scores of distance love between different genders. 5) the total score of subjective feeling scale of love and the emotion of each dimension and personality trait, the originality and persistence. There was a significant positive correlation between personality, extroversion and fit humanity, and significant positive correlation between subjective feelings of love conflict and attachment anxiety. Conclusion (1) the subjective feeling of Love scale (RPUSS) has reasonable structure, good reliability and validity, and all kinds of indexes meet the requirements of measurement. 2) in the relationship, there is no difference in subjective feeling of love between the two sexes, there is no difference in the subjective feeling of love between the two sexes, and there is no difference between the two sexes in the subjective feeling of love. In contrast, the older the age, the higher the quality of the relationship, the longer the love time, the higher the quality, the more the number of relationships, the lower the quality of love.) the emotional personality traits of the individual have a destructive effect on the quality of love, while persistence, originality, extroversion, etc. Virtue and personality traits promote the quality of love, and there is an inherent relationship between love conflict and attachment anxiety.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:C913.1;B841

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 安丽霞;;霍曼斯交换理论背景下夫妻关系的尝试性描述[J];长春师范学院学报;2007年03期

2 何艳;付海玲;韩洁;;关于大学生性别特质与恋爱关系满意度的调查研究[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2008年06期

3 王宇中;王中杰;贾黎斋;赵江涛;李瑞芳;;婚姻主观感受量表(MPS)的编制[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2009年01期

4 张绍刚;;大学生自恋与恋爱满意度的关系研究[J];科教导刊(上旬刊);2011年10期

5 李虹,陈启芳;Kansas婚姻满意感量表的北京和香港常模[J];心理发展与教育;2002年04期

6 杨炯;胡怀林;俞乐笑;;大学生性别角色与两性交往质量的关系[J];心理发展与教育;2008年02期

7 李同归;加藤和生;;成人依恋的测量:亲密关系经历量表(ECR)中文版[J];心理学报;2006年03期

8 刘影春;王云;李芳;林婧媛;;大学生恋爱性行为调查与分析[J];教育学术月刊;2012年02期

9 石向实;吴钟芳;;大学生幽默风格与恋爱关系满意度的研究[J];宜宾学院学报;2011年09期

10 程灶火,谭林湘,杨英,林晓虹,周岱,蒋小娟,苏艳华,赵勇,尉迟西翎;中国人婚姻质量问卷的编制和信效度分析[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2004年03期

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 刘红梅;恋爱关系中满意度与承诺关系的研究[D];南京师范大学;2007年

2 高玉华;成人依恋与婚姻质量的关系研究[D];东北师范大学;2008年

3 熊剑峰;大学生亲密关系满意感及其与依恋类型的关系研究[D];江西师范大学;2008年

4 安晓斌;大学生恋爱观及其与人格类型的相关研究[D];西南大学;2009年

5 张萍;当代大学生的爱情价值观及与其压力应对方式的关系研究[D];西南大学;2009年

6 程曦;大学生自信与恋爱幸福感的相关研究[D];西南大学;2009年

7 孙璐;大学生隐性自恋及其与恋爱满意度的关系研究[D];西南大学;2010年

8 崔林霞;牺牲与共依附特质对亲密关系质量的影响[D];华东师范大学;2010年

9 王皓;性别角色特征与恋爱满意度的关系[D];河北大学;2010年

10 孙雪松;投入与回报及平衡对大学生恋爱关系满意度的影响研究[D];陕西师范大学;2010年



本文编号:1854359

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/1854359.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户caee1***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com