现代学术的异化及其匡正

发布时间：2018-05-31 18:58

本文选题：现代学术 + 学术资源　；参考：《学术月刊》2011年12期

【摘要】：近代以后,经过科学革命与工业革命,科学发挥出强大功能,并与资本相互促进,于是,古代学术体系逐渐演变为现代学术体系,成为资本生产体系的一个重要环节。古今学术体系变异的核心是:古代学者掌握学术资源,无须以学术为谋生手段;现代学者不掌握学术资源,须以学术为谋生手段。这一变异衍生出古今学术的其他变迁:从非职业化、非专业化走向职业化、专业化;从自由变得不自由;从贵族学术走向平民学术;从贵族的风雅品转变为资本与权力的工具;学者从不接受考核到必须接受考核。因此,现代学术变成了一个服从于资本和权力目的的异化的生产体系。它并非为学术而学术,而只是为创新而创新。而学者作为学术雇佣劳动者,不得不适应此体系,从而形成异己的现代学术生态。在此生态中,一方面,学者被异化为学术机器;另一方面,因知识是一种权力,导致专家也是一种权力。为了避免专家滥用知识而危害公众和社会,有必要对学术进行调控,强调学术责任,限制和监督专家的权力,建立专家言论责任追究制度。
[Abstract]:After modern times, after the scientific revolution and the industrial revolution, science played a powerful function and promoted with the capital, so the ancient academic system gradually evolved into the modern academic system and became an important link of the capital production system. The core of the variation of ancient and modern academic system is that the ancient scholars do not have to make a living by learning the academic resources, and the modern scholars do not master the academic resources, they must rely on the academic as a means of earning a living. This variation derived from other changes of ancient and modern academic: from non-professional, non-professional to professional, from freedom to freedom, from aristocratic learning to civilian learning, from aristocratic elegance to capital and power; A scholar has never accepted an examination until he has to. As a result, modern learning has become a dissimilated production system for capital and power purposes. It is not for academic, but for innovation. As an academic wage laborer, scholars have to adapt to this system, thus forming a modern academic ecology. In this ecology, on the one hand, scholars are alienated as academic machines; on the other hand, because knowledge is a kind of power, experts are also a kind of power. In order to avoid the abuse of knowledge by experts and harm the public and society, it is necessary to regulate and control the academic, emphasize the academic responsibility, limit and supervise the authority of the experts, and establish the system of investigating the responsibility of the experts.
【作者单位】：四川大学政治学院;
【基金】：四川大学中央高校基本科研业务费研究专项项目(skqx201101、skgt201103)资助
【分类号】：C12

【共引文献】