转型期农民纠纷解决方式的社会学研究
发布时间:2018-06-01 16:52
本文选题:农民纠纷 + 纠纷解决方式 ; 参考:《山东理工大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:当前,中国农村社会正经历着由传统伦理型社会向法理型社会的深刻变革,农民的思想、行为方式等都在趋于理性化,现代性,这种变化必然反映在农民纠纷及其解决方式的选择上。本文是以社会学理论和方法为基础,以理性选择理论和关系距离理论为研究视角,通过对鲁西南地区马岭岗镇农民纠纷及其解决方式的问卷调查和个案访谈,分析了当前中国农民纠纷的基本情况,重点探讨了农民纠纷解决方式的特点、选择策略、影响因素,并为建立和完善符合农民需求的纠纷解决机制提出了自己的思考和建议。 本文包括五章,可分为三个部分。第一章为第一部分,主要介绍了课题来源、研究意义、理论基础、核心概念、研究方法,并对国内外以往的相关研究进行了文献梳理。第二章、第三章、第四章为第二部分,重点分析研究了转型期的农村社会多样化和复杂化的纠纷现状,农民纠纷解决的主要方式,农民纠纷解决方式的特点及其选择策略、影响因素。认为在当前我国农村社会,既存在国家正式纠纷解决方式,也存在民间非正式纠纷解决方式,已初步形成了多元化的纠纷解决体系,而民间方式仍然是农民主要的纠纷解决方式;农民对解纷方式的选择呈现顺次递进的特点,即如果纠纷在低效力等级的纠纷解决方式中得不到解决,那么在个人理性的作用下,他们会寻求更高效力级别的纠纷解决途径,国家正式纠纷解决方式中的司法方式(诉讼方式)成为最后一道屏障。影响农民纠纷解决方式选择的因素是多方面的:从案件的主体因素看,案主的年龄、性别、文化程度、经济收入等对纠纷解决反方式的选择,影响很大;从案件因素看,案件的性质、当事人的地位结构与差异、关系距离等对农民纠纷结局方式的选择有重要影响;从社会因素看,社群意识、权威认同、经济成本、政府正式纠纷解决机制的不足和民间纠纷结局方式的适应性,是影响农民纠纷解决方式选择的重要因素。第五章为第三部分,在对农民纠纷解决方式全面分析研究的基础上,提出当前我国广大农村地区,农村社会生活的“村庄共同体”依然存在;乡土社会作为一个熟人社会的基本状况仍然保留着;现代农村社会产生了对法律的内在需求,但农民的法律意识依然薄弱;良好的农民纠纷解决方式,有利于促进社会和谐,因此我们必须充分重视民间规范的基础性作用,弥补市场经济的不足,建立和完善农民多方面、多层次需求的纠纷解决机制。
[Abstract]:At present, China's rural society is undergoing a profound transformation from a traditional ethical society to a legal one. The farmers' thinking and behavior are tending to be rationalized and modern. This kind of change must reflect in the choice of peasant dispute and its solution. This paper is based on the theory and method of sociology, taking rational choice theory and relation distance theory as the research angle, through the questionnaire survey and the case interview to the peasant dispute and its solution in Malinggang Town, southwest of Shandong Province. This paper analyzes on the basic situation of Chinese peasants' disputes, probes into the characteristics, selection strategies and influencing factors of the peasants' dispute resolution methods, and puts forward some thoughts and suggestions for establishing and perfecting the dispute resolution mechanism in accordance with the farmers' needs. This article includes five chapters, can be divided into three parts. The first chapter is the first part, which mainly introduces the source of the subject, significance, theoretical basis, core concepts, research methods, and domestic and foreign previous related research literature combing. Chapter two, Chapter three, Chapter four is the second part, which focuses on the analysis and study of the rural social diversity and complexity of the status quo of disputes, the main ways of peasant dispute resolution, the characteristics of the peasant dispute resolution methods and their choice strategies. Influencing factors. It is believed that in the current rural society, there are both formal and informal dispute resolution methods of the state, and a pluralistic dispute resolution system has been initially formed. However, the folk way is still the main dispute resolution method for the peasants, and the peasants' choice of the dispute resolution mode shows the characteristics of progressive step by step, that is, if the dispute is not resolved in the low-grade dispute resolution method, then under the function of personal rationality, They will seek a more effective level of dispute resolution, the state of formal dispute resolution in the way of justice (litigation) as a final barrier. The factors that affect the choice of dispute resolution methods for farmers are as follows: from the point of view of the main factors of the case, the age, sex, education level and economic income of the owner of the case have a great impact on the choice of the counter-mode of dispute resolution, and from the point of view of the case factors, The nature of the case, the status structure and difference of the parties, the distance between the relationship and other factors have an important influence on the choice of the outcome of the peasant dispute, from the perspective of social factors, community awareness, authority identity, economic costs, etc. The deficiency of the government's formal dispute resolution mechanism and the adaptability of the folk dispute outcome are the important factors influencing the choice of the peasants' dispute settlement. The fifth chapter is the third part, on the basis of the comprehensive analysis and research on the peasants' dispute resolution, it points out that the village community still exists in the vast rural areas of our country; The basic condition of the local society as an acquaintance society is still preserved; the modern rural society has produced the inherent demand for the law, but the farmer's legal consciousness is still weak, the good peasant dispute settlement way, is advantageous to promote the social harmony, Therefore, we must pay full attention to the basic role of folk norms, make up for the lack of market economy, and establish and perfect the dispute resolution mechanism of farmers in various and multi-level needs.
【学位授予单位】:山东理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:C912.82
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 陆益龙;;纠纷解决的法社会学研究:问题及范式[J];湖南社会科学;2009年01期
2 郭星华,王平;中国农村的纠纷与解决途径——关于中国农村法律意识与法律行为的实证研究[J];江苏社会科学;2004年02期
3 郭星华;邢朝国;;从送法下乡到理性选择——乡土社会的法律实践[J];黑龙江社会科学;2010年01期
4 陈伟杰;郭星华;;法律的差序利用——以一个宗族村落的纠纷调解为例[J];中国农业大学学报(社会科学版);2009年02期
5 赵旭东;习俗、权威与纠纷解决的场域——河北一村落的法律人类学考察[J];社会学研究;2001年02期
6 董磊明;;村庄纠纷调解机制的研究路径[J];学习与探索;2006年01期
7 董磊明;陈柏峰;聂良波;;结构混乱与迎法下乡——河南宋村法律实践的解读[J];中国社会科学;2008年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 朱长江;国家法与民间规则的互动——对河北农村社区“私了”现象的分析[D];中国农业大学;2003年
2 艾丹;透析农村民事纠纷解决现状[D];南昌大学;2008年
,本文编号:1964953
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/1964953.html