“多元建构”视角对问卷调查的方法论意义
发布时间：2018-12-11 05:27
【摘要】：多元建构视角认为,问卷调查资料是多元主体相互作用、共同建构的结果。多元建构视角有三个方面的方法论意义:第一,问卷是由待测变量和语言刺激构成的,问卷设计应先设计待测变量,然后在此基础上设计语言刺激;第二,研究者应同时从受访者和访问员的角度来设计问卷和组织调查,尤其要通过提高问卷质量来降低受访者参与访谈的成本及访问员的工作难度和心理压力;第三,实施访谈时,访问员应引导受访者做出有利于访谈顺利进行的情境定义。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of multiple construction, the questionnaire data is the result of the interaction and construction of multiple subjects. There are three aspects of methodological significance from the perspective of multivariate construction: first, the questionnaire is composed of untested variables and language stimuli, which should be designed first, and then language stimuli should be designed on this basis; Second, researchers should design questionnaires and organize surveys from the perspective of interviewees and interviewees at the same time, especially by improving the quality of questionnaires to reduce the cost of interviewees' participation in interviews, the job difficulty and psychological pressure of interviewees; Thirdly, the interviewee should guide the interviewee to define the situation which is conducive to the successful conduct of the interview.
【作者单位】： 贵州民族大学民族学与社会学学院;南京大学社会学院;
【分类号】：C31
本文编号：2371961
[Abstract]:From the perspective of multiple construction, the questionnaire data is the result of the interaction and construction of multiple subjects. There are three aspects of methodological significance from the perspective of multivariate construction: first, the questionnaire is composed of untested variables and language stimuli, which should be designed first, and then language stimuli should be designed on this basis; Second, researchers should design questionnaires and organize surveys from the perspective of interviewees and interviewees at the same time, especially by improving the quality of questionnaires to reduce the cost of interviewees' participation in interviews, the job difficulty and psychological pressure of interviewees; Thirdly, the interviewee should guide the interviewee to define the situation which is conducive to the successful conduct of the interview.
【作者单位】： 贵州民族大学民族学与社会学学院;南京大学社会学院;
【分类号】：C31
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 ;《社区》读者问卷调查表[J];社区;2005年02期
2 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2371961
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2371961.html
