中国哲学社会科学学风规范议题三论——问学于李醒民教授
发布时间：2018-12-15 07:12
【摘要】：中国哲学社会科学研究中不断提升的理论自由度与学术评价的学科专业化之间事实上陷入到了一对难以相互润合的制肘,而这种制肘客观上逐渐衍生了中国哲学社会科学发展中的诸多新困惑,如学风规范等系列命题。面对这些新困惑,我们绝不能单纯寄望于依赖道德批判去单向抽象破题,而是要深入这些新困惑内部理性挖掘其潜在机理,进而剖析出其背后真实难点,以客观理性态度来具体纠偏中国哲学社会科学学术发展中的诸项困难,从而摈弃毫无意义的道德审判心理,走出学术批判中的伦理性思维左右困局。本文就中国哲学社会科学学风规范议题中的三大关键词:"学术"、"学界"和"学者",与中国科学院李醒民教授提出的"学术断然拒绝平庸"、"学界要以学术为中心和导向"等论点展开商榷。
[Abstract]:The increasing degree of theoretical freedom in the research of Chinese philosophy and social sciences and the discipline specialization of academic evaluation are in fact trapped in a pair of constraints which are difficult to combine with each other. And this kind of restriction has gradually derived many new puzzles in the development of Chinese philosophy and social sciences, such as the rules of study style and other series of propositions. In the face of these new puzzles, we must not simply rely on moral criticism to solve problems in a one-way abstract way, but rather dig into the underlying mechanism of these new puzzles, and then analyze the real difficulties behind them. The objective and rational attitude is to correct the difficulties in the academic development of Chinese philosophy and social sciences so as to abandon the meaningless moral judgment psychology and get out of the dilemma caused by the ethical thinking in academic criticism. This paper deals with the three key words in the study style of Chinese philosophy and social sciences: "academic", "academic" and "scholar", and "academic rejection of mediocrity" put forward by Professor Li Xingmin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Academic circles should focus on academicism and guide, and so on.
【作者单位】： 东北师范大学农村教育研究所;
【分类号】：C03
，
本文编号：2380217
[Abstract]:The increasing degree of theoretical freedom in the research of Chinese philosophy and social sciences and the discipline specialization of academic evaluation are in fact trapped in a pair of constraints which are difficult to combine with each other. And this kind of restriction has gradually derived many new puzzles in the development of Chinese philosophy and social sciences, such as the rules of study style and other series of propositions. In the face of these new puzzles, we must not simply rely on moral criticism to solve problems in a one-way abstract way, but rather dig into the underlying mechanism of these new puzzles, and then analyze the real difficulties behind them. The objective and rational attitude is to correct the difficulties in the academic development of Chinese philosophy and social sciences so as to abandon the meaningless moral judgment psychology and get out of the dilemma caused by the ethical thinking in academic criticism. This paper deals with the three key words in the study style of Chinese philosophy and social sciences: "academic", "academic" and "scholar", and "academic rejection of mediocrity" put forward by Professor Li Xingmin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Academic circles should focus on academicism and guide, and so on.
【作者单位】： 东北师范大学农村教育研究所;
【分类号】：C03
，
本文编号：2380217
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2380217.html
