斗气—乡村社会中的日常生活政治
发布时间：2018-12-16 18:12
【摘要】：“气”是中国文化的重要组成部分,在中国的思想传统中,气涵盖天地万物,是万物之始和世界的本原。它是一个极具中国传统哲学和文化特色的概念,不仅是一个与生命意义相关的生理意义上的气,更多的是一个与心理、伦理有着更为紧密关系意义上的气。有气息才证明一个个体是活着的状态,我们把它作为人的生命力的基础,是人的正常生命能量之所在,由于气的凝聚引起气的进发我们叫做“斗气”。“斗气”作为一种日常生活政治的呈现方式,可以说能够集中体现过日子中复杂的人际关系、道德情感乃至权利与利益的纠纷,向我们展现的是人与人之间的爱、恨、礼、义的情感纠葛。斗气虽属于日常生活政治却和“公共领域中”的抗争政治有着某种内在的相似和根本的不同。应星在《气与抗争政治》这本书中谈论的主要是下层农民的上访上诉与基层政府之间的抗争政治相互博弈,虽然在乡村社会也不乏家庭、邻里之间的斗气、矛盾升级最后需要第三方主要是政府、司法部门的介入,但是我们大部分的日常斗气即使是涉及到一些利益、权利、政治纠纷却是通过相互之间的“斗”来解决问题而相对很少闹到必须要第三方的强势介入。问题就在这,为什么家庭内部成员、家庭、邻里之间热衷于自己通过相互之间的斗来解决“生活政治”,除了觉得芝麻点小事不足以拿上台面上讲的考虑外,对公共部门的不信任以及诉讼成本的考虑这些原因以外,我们是不是该关注村民自身内心深处的思想行动逻辑,这种长期在乡村社会日常生活中形成的一套“无为”与“为”的斗的逻辑呢?在乡村社会或许它很少是公共领域需要经常关注的话题,但斗气背后的委屈和公正往往是私人领域更为关心在意的东西,人民对这种朴素正义和公正的理解往往会超出我们想象。这种“斗”的意义是跟一个人尊严、人格、价值,跟一个家庭的颜面、兴衰紧密联系在一起的。乡村斗气或许是公共部门无法插手和难以调节的乡村现象,但作为一个具有人文关怀精神的人,我们需要关心苦恼着每个家庭和家庭成员的生活政治、家庭政治,关心他们的心理动态找到一定的内在逻辑并寻求一种比较合理的解释。斗气是乡村社会人们的一种日常生活呈现,看似平淡却不乏味。在社会转型的大背景下,伦理和价值变迁的乡土社会,本文想通过解读“乡村斗气”理解这一乡村社会日常生活常态的行为,进一步以一种“日常生活政治”的视角来剖析这种日常生活之间的斗气背后隐藏的内在逻辑,更好地理解这种“情理政治”,探查乡村社会中人们在这种政治中的“变与不变”的平衡逻辑。
[Abstract]:Qi is an important part of Chinese culture. In Chinese thought tradition, Qi covers everything in heaven and earth, and is the origin of all things and the world. It is a concept with the characteristics of Chinese traditional philosophy and culture. It is not only a physical qi related to the meaning of life, but also a more closely related to psychology and ethics. Breath proves that an individual is a living state. We regard it as the basis of human vitality, and it is where the normal life energy of human beings lies. We call it "fighting qi" because of the agglomeration of qi. As a way of presenting the politics of daily life, "fighting qi" can be said to embody the complex interpersonal relationships, moral feelings and even disputes between rights and interests in the daily life. It shows us the love, hate and propriety among people. The emotional entanglement of righteousness. Although the fighting spirit belongs to the politics of daily life, it has some internal similarities and fundamental differences with the politics of resistance in the public sphere. In the book "Qi and Resistance Politics", Yingxing mainly talks about the game between the appeal of the lower-class peasants and the political struggle between the grass-roots governments, although in rural society there is also a lack of family and fighting among the neighbors. In the end, the escalation of contradictions will require the intervention of the government and the judiciary, but most of our daily fighting even involves some interests and rights. Political disputes are solved by fighting each other, with relatively little need for a strong third-party intervention. The question is this: why are family members, families, and neighbors keen on solving "life politics" through fighting among themselves, except for the fact that little sesame matters are not enough for the consideration on the table? Beyond the distrust of the public sector and the cost of litigation, should we focus on the inner logic of the villagers' own thoughts and actions? What is the logic of "inaction" and "action" formed in the daily life of rural society for a long time? In rural society it may rarely be the subject of constant attention in the public sphere, but the grievances and justice behind the fighting are often more of a concern to the private sphere. People's understanding of such simplicity, justice and justice is often beyond our imagination. The meaning of this "fight" is closely related to a person's dignity, personality, value, the face of a family, rise and fall. Rural fighting may be a rural phenomenon that the public sector is unable to intervene in and can't adjust, but as a humanist, we need to care about the politics of life, the politics of the family, the lives of every family member, Concerned about their psychological dynamics to find a certain internal logic and seek a more reasonable explanation. Fighting air is a kind of daily life of people in rural society, it seems dull but not boring. Under the background of social transformation, the rural society with the change of ethics and value, this paper tries to understand the normal behavior of the daily life of the rural society through the interpretation of "fighting energy in the countryside". In order to better understand this kind of "rational politics", we can further analyze the hidden internal logic behind this kind of fighting between daily life from the perspective of "daily life politics". To probe into the balanced logic of change and immutability in this kind of politics in rural society.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：C912.82
本文编号：2382817
[Abstract]:Qi is an important part of Chinese culture. In Chinese thought tradition, Qi covers everything in heaven and earth, and is the origin of all things and the world. It is a concept with the characteristics of Chinese traditional philosophy and culture. It is not only a physical qi related to the meaning of life, but also a more closely related to psychology and ethics. Breath proves that an individual is a living state. We regard it as the basis of human vitality, and it is where the normal life energy of human beings lies. We call it "fighting qi" because of the agglomeration of qi. As a way of presenting the politics of daily life, "fighting qi" can be said to embody the complex interpersonal relationships, moral feelings and even disputes between rights and interests in the daily life. It shows us the love, hate and propriety among people. The emotional entanglement of righteousness. Although the fighting spirit belongs to the politics of daily life, it has some internal similarities and fundamental differences with the politics of resistance in the public sphere. In the book "Qi and Resistance Politics", Yingxing mainly talks about the game between the appeal of the lower-class peasants and the political struggle between the grass-roots governments, although in rural society there is also a lack of family and fighting among the neighbors. In the end, the escalation of contradictions will require the intervention of the government and the judiciary, but most of our daily fighting even involves some interests and rights. Political disputes are solved by fighting each other, with relatively little need for a strong third-party intervention. The question is this: why are family members, families, and neighbors keen on solving "life politics" through fighting among themselves, except for the fact that little sesame matters are not enough for the consideration on the table? Beyond the distrust of the public sector and the cost of litigation, should we focus on the inner logic of the villagers' own thoughts and actions? What is the logic of "inaction" and "action" formed in the daily life of rural society for a long time? In rural society it may rarely be the subject of constant attention in the public sphere, but the grievances and justice behind the fighting are often more of a concern to the private sphere. People's understanding of such simplicity, justice and justice is often beyond our imagination. The meaning of this "fight" is closely related to a person's dignity, personality, value, the face of a family, rise and fall. Rural fighting may be a rural phenomenon that the public sector is unable to intervene in and can't adjust, but as a humanist, we need to care about the politics of life, the politics of the family, the lives of every family member, Concerned about their psychological dynamics to find a certain internal logic and seek a more reasonable explanation. Fighting air is a kind of daily life of people in rural society, it seems dull but not boring. Under the background of social transformation, the rural society with the change of ethics and value, this paper tries to understand the normal behavior of the daily life of the rural society through the interpretation of "fighting energy in the countryside". In order to better understand this kind of "rational politics", we can further analyze the hidden internal logic behind this kind of fighting between daily life from the perspective of "daily life politics". To probe into the balanced logic of change and immutability in this kind of politics in rural society.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：C912.82
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 任敏;;现代社会的人际关系类型及其互动逻辑——试谈“差序格局”模型的扩展[J];华中科技大学学报(社会科学版);2009年02期
2 李小娟,肖玲诺;90年代日常生活批判研究述评[J];教学与研究;1998年07期
3 陈柏峰;;“气”与村庄生活的互动——皖北李圩村调查[J];开放时代;2007年06期
4 刘海;康海勃;;“气”与“面子”的两相纠葛——解读《秋菊打官司》的文化根由[J];理论月刊;2011年02期
5 陈柏峰;;秋菊的“气”与村长的“面子”——《秋菊打官司》再解读[J];山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年03期
6 吴飞;;论“过日子”[J];社会学研究;2007年06期
7 郑震;;列斐伏尔日常生活批判理论的社会学意义——迈向一种日常生活的社会学[J];社会学研究;2011年03期
8 贺雪峰;苏明华;;乡村关系研究的视角与进路[J];社会科学研究;2006年01期
9 张银岳;;从结构、心灵到体系:社会行动的逻辑演进[J];西南大学学报(社会科学版);2010年05期
10 吴毅;无政治村庄[J];浙江学刊;2002年01期
，本文编号：2382817
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2382817.html
