“东方学”与“中国东方学学术史”构想
发布时间：2019-02-22 10:17
【摘要】："东方学"是产生于近代西方的一门学科。萌芽于16世纪,17、18世纪获得发展,确立于19世纪。因其所涉面非常广和生成于特定的历史文化语境,导致其统摄各分支学科的宏观理论有待进一步完善、"西方中心"立场明显的局限。由于东方学家不同的研究目的,东方学内部具有不同倾向,有"意识形态的东方学"和"科学的东方学"两种形态。我们应该着手整理中国20世纪以来的东方学研究成果,以《中国"东方学"学术史》的研究,完善中国东方学的学科建制;展示中国东方学的成果,与西方的东方学形成鲜明对照;促进中国与东方各国新型的国际文化关系。
[Abstract]:Orientalism is a discipline that originated in the modern West. It sprouted in the 16 th century, developed in the 17 th century and was established in the 19 th century. Due to its wide scope and its emergence in a specific historical and cultural context, its macro-theory of dominating various branches of discipline needs to be further improved, and the position of "Western center" is obviously limited. Because of the different research purpose of Orientalists, there are different tendencies in Orientalism, there are two forms of ideological Orientalism and Scientific Orientalism. We should start to sort out the research achievements of Chinese Orientalism since the 20th century and perfect the discipline system of Chinese Orientalism by studying the academic History of Chinese Orientalism. To show the achievements of Chinese Orientalism is in sharp contrast with that of western Orientalism, and to promote the new international cultural relationship between China and other countries in the East.
【作者单位】： 天津师范大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目(14ZDB083) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(10YJA752013)
【分类号】：C0
本文编号：2428118
[Abstract]:Orientalism is a discipline that originated in the modern West. It sprouted in the 16 th century, developed in the 17 th century and was established in the 19 th century. Due to its wide scope and its emergence in a specific historical and cultural context, its macro-theory of dominating various branches of discipline needs to be further improved, and the position of "Western center" is obviously limited. Because of the different research purpose of Orientalists, there are different tendencies in Orientalism, there are two forms of ideological Orientalism and Scientific Orientalism. We should start to sort out the research achievements of Chinese Orientalism since the 20th century and perfect the discipline system of Chinese Orientalism by studying the academic History of Chinese Orientalism. To show the achievements of Chinese Orientalism is in sharp contrast with that of western Orientalism, and to promote the new international cultural relationship between China and other countries in the East.
【作者单位】： 天津师范大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目(14ZDB083) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(10YJA752013)
【分类号】：C0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 李祥林;北京大学东方学国际学术研讨会述要[J];西藏大学学报(汉文版);2001年03期
2 ;林荣新:在“北京大学季羡林东方学研究讲席”启动仪式上的致辞[J];闽商文化研究;2012年02期
3 Л·С·贝列罗莫夫;郭燕顺;;苏联科学中对传统的研究问题(下)[J];社会科学战线;1987年04期
4 景奎;“庆北大百年·南亚文化学术研讨会”综述[J];南亚研究;1998年01期
5 章辉;;如何理解《东方学》——兼谈学界对萨义德的批评与误解[J];北方论丛;2006年02期
6 本刊编辑部;;“北京大学季羡林东方学研究讲席”在京启动[J];闽商文化研究;2012年02期
7 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 何卫华;爱德华·赛义德：颠覆型的知识分子与对东方学的质疑[D];华中师范大学;2004年
，本文编号：2428118
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2428118.html
