应当重视“元学术史”的写作
发布时间：2019-03-02 15:42
【摘要】：现今讨论"重写学术史"是有意义的。但讨论不能局限于如何依据新出土的简帛文献以改写原有的学术史,而应该进一步讨论如何实现学术史写作上的形式革命。基于这一思考,应当重视"元学术史"写作问题。确立"元学术史"是规范各专门学术史的前提。我们已出版的各类学术史,之所以缺乏特色,大多雷同,就因为缺少特定的"元学术史"来引导和规范各专门学术史的撰著;"学术"的本质诉求决定了"学术史"之处理的对象是"知识"。"元学术史"研究对象是知识本身,而各专门学术史研究的是知识的特殊表现。"元学术史"与各专门学术史之研究对象从根本上讲固然都可以说是研究思想,但它们各自研究思想的进路不同,"元学术史"研究的是思想化为知识,而各专门学术史研究的则是知识化的思想。知识化的思想是在思想化为知识之后才有可能,所以"元学术史"对于各种专门学术史来说具有本体地位。
[Abstract]:Today's discussion of "rewriting academic History" makes sense. However, the discussion should not be limited to how to rewrite the original academic history according to the newly unearthed documents, but also to further discuss how to realize the formal revolution in the writing of academic history. Based on this thinking, we should pay attention to the writing of Meta-academic History. The establishment of "meta-academic history" is the premise of standardizing the special academic history. We have published all kinds of academic history, most of the lack of characteristics, most of the same, because of the lack of a specific "meta-academic history" to guide and standardize the writing of various special academic history; The essence of "academic" determines that the object of "academic history" is "knowledge". " The research object of meta-academic history is knowledge itself, and the special manifestation of knowledge is studied by each special academic history. Although both the Yuan academic History and the research objects of each specialized academic history can be said to be thought of research fundamentally, they have different approaches to the study of their thoughts, and the study of the History of Yuan academic Studies is about the transformation of thought into knowledge. What each specialized academic history studies is the intellectual thought. The thought of intellectualization is only possible after the thought is transformed into knowledge, so "meta-academic history" has the Noumenon status for all kinds of special academic history.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学哲学系;
【分类号】：C09
，
本文编号：2433192
[Abstract]:Today's discussion of "rewriting academic History" makes sense. However, the discussion should not be limited to how to rewrite the original academic history according to the newly unearthed documents, but also to further discuss how to realize the formal revolution in the writing of academic history. Based on this thinking, we should pay attention to the writing of Meta-academic History. The establishment of "meta-academic history" is the premise of standardizing the special academic history. We have published all kinds of academic history, most of the lack of characteristics, most of the same, because of the lack of a specific "meta-academic history" to guide and standardize the writing of various special academic history; The essence of "academic" determines that the object of "academic history" is "knowledge". " The research object of meta-academic history is knowledge itself, and the special manifestation of knowledge is studied by each special academic history. Although both the Yuan academic History and the research objects of each specialized academic history can be said to be thought of research fundamentally, they have different approaches to the study of their thoughts, and the study of the History of Yuan academic Studies is about the transformation of thought into knowledge. What each specialized academic history studies is the intellectual thought. The thought of intellectualization is only possible after the thought is transformed into knowledge, so "meta-academic history" has the Noumenon status for all kinds of special academic history.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学哲学系;
【分类号】：C09
，
本文编号：2433192
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2433192.html
