多中心治理视角下深圳市社区治理问题研究

发布时间：2019-03-21 09:00

【摘要】：处于快速转型时期的当前中国社会,新情况,新问题不断涌现。作为中国城市基层的基本单位,城市社区由原来单一的政府权力主体正日益地向政府、市场、社会和居民广泛参与等多主体的治理体制转变。社区治理已然成为中国创新社会管理新格局的关键。深圳市作为我国改革开放的前沿地带,理应成为社区治理创新的先导者。多年来,深圳市社区治理体制一直在进行不断地探索和变革,在不断创新的过程中积累了许多有益的经验,如被国内其他城市相继借鉴的“盐田模式”,“南山模式”,“桃源居善治模式”等。虽然深圳市在社区治理创新方面取得了一些成绩,但是由于政府职能转变不到位,社区中介组织发育不足,社区居民利益诉求存在差别,社区居民参与社区治理的意识不强等因素的影响,导致深圳市社区治理创新面临着自治趋势与行政化现状的矛盾,社区治理机制不健全,社区治理法制不完善,“条”“块”矛盾使社区治理体制不顺以及社区居委会角色错位等方面的困境。本文致力于就这些问题及引发这些问题的成因之研究,试图在借鉴纽约、东京和新加坡等城市在社区治理方面所取得的成功经验的基础上,从培育社区治理的多元主体,建立健全社区治理的法规制度,培植社区治理的公共参与机制,理顺社区治理体制,引入社区治理的市场竞争机制等几个方面出发,对构建深圳市社区多中心治理目标模式的路径选择进行了初步设想,期望深圳市社区治理创新更好地适应本地经济社会的可持续发展,也为全国其他城市社区治理创新提供可资借鉴的有益经验。
[Abstract]:In the rapid transition period of the current Chinese society, new conditions, new problems continue to emerge. As the basic unit of urban grass-roots in China, the urban community is changing from a single government power body to a multi-subject governance system, such as the government, the market, the society and the wide participation of the residents. Community governance has become the key to the new pattern of innovative social management in China. As the frontier of China's reform and opening-up, Shenzhen should be the leader of community governance innovation. Over the years, the community governance system in Shenzhen has been continuously explored and reformed, and many beneficial experiences have been accumulated in the process of continuous innovation, such as the "Yantian Model" and "Nanshan Model", which have been used for reference by other cities in the country one after another. "Taoyuan resident good governance model" and so on. Although Shenzhen has made some achievements in the innovation of community governance, because the transformation of government functions is not in place, the development of community intermediary organizations is insufficient, there are differences in the interests of community residents. The community residents' consciousness of participating in community governance is not strong, which leads to the contradiction between self-government trend and administrative situation in Shenzhen, the mechanism of community governance is not perfect, the legal system of community governance is not perfect, and the legal system of community governance is not perfect. The contradiction of "rule" and "block" makes the system of community governance not smooth and the role of neighborhood committee misplaced and so on. Based on the successful experience in community governance in New York, Tokyo and Singapore, this paper is devoted to the study of these problems and the causes of these problems, and tries to cultivate the pluralistic subjects of community governance on the basis of the successful experiences of cities such as New York, Tokyo and Singapore. We should establish and perfect the laws and regulations of community governance, cultivate the mechanism of public participation in community governance, straighten out the system of community governance, and introduce the market competition mechanism of community governance. The path selection of constructing the target model of community multi-center governance in Shenzhen is initially envisaged, and the innovation of community governance in Shenzhen is expected to better adapt to the sustainable development of local economy and society. It also provides useful experience for the innovation of community governance in other cities.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：C916

【参考文献】