关于曼海姆悖论及其辩护的认识
发布时间:2019-04-23 08:32
【摘要】:曼海姆的知识社会学认为社会思想因采用不同视角而带来了"合理的偏见",同时又要求知识社会学进行不带偏见的思考。这种自相矛盾的理论观点被Geertz Clifford称作曼海姆悖论。许多学者尝试针对曼海姆悖论进行辩护。悖论与辩护是围绕知识的构建规则及其实现而展开的。曼海姆悖论在方法论上是可以被消解的;在本体论意义上的悖论性指责不具有理论意义。
[Abstract]:Mannheim's sociology of knowledge holds that social thought has brought "reasonable prejudice" due to different perspectives, and requires the sociology of knowledge to think without prejudice. This paradoxical theory is called the Mannheim paradox by Geertz Clifford. Many scholars try to defend the Mannheim paradox. Paradox and defense revolve around the rule of knowledge construction and its realization. The Mannheim paradox can be resolved in methodology, but the criticism of paradox in ontological sense has no theoretical significance.
【作者单位】: 中国科学院大学人文学院;
【基金】:国家社科基金重点项目“科学知识的民主问题研究”(15AZX007)
【分类号】:C91-0
本文编号:2463299
[Abstract]:Mannheim's sociology of knowledge holds that social thought has brought "reasonable prejudice" due to different perspectives, and requires the sociology of knowledge to think without prejudice. This paradoxical theory is called the Mannheim paradox by Geertz Clifford. Many scholars try to defend the Mannheim paradox. Paradox and defense revolve around the rule of knowledge construction and its realization. The Mannheim paradox can be resolved in methodology, but the criticism of paradox in ontological sense has no theoretical significance.
【作者单位】: 中国科学院大学人文学院;
【基金】:国家社科基金重点项目“科学知识的民主问题研究”(15AZX007)
【分类号】:C91-0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 熊春文;直面“诸神纷争”的世界——从《意识形态与乌托邦》看曼海姆与韦伯的思想关联[J];社会学研究;2004年03期
2 弓志军;;曼海姆知识社会学述评[J];探索与争鸣;1988年03期
3 张梅;;走向学科建构的具体研究——曼海姆对意识形态与乌托邦的论述[J];新疆社科论坛;2007年06期
4 林建成;;科学引领社会思潮应当借鉴相关学科的优秀成果[J];洛阳师范学院学报;2012年03期
5 杨生平;;曼海姆论保守主义思想探析[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2011年04期
6 ;[J];;年期
,本文编号:2463299
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2463299.html