警惕人文学术研究的“技术化”!
发布时间:2019-05-19 23:59
【摘要】:正近期,国务院办公厅下发《关于优化学术环境的指导意见》,对改革学术研究运行、管理、评价的诸多积弊提出了意见,令人欣喜!的确,当下学术科研存在着不少问题,亟须破解。就人文学术研究而言,"技术化"可谓面临的最为严重的危机。人文学术与自然科学、社会科学的不同,在于它以探究人的生存意义和境界为中心,以构建人类精神家园和理想世界为职志。狄尔泰即认为,人文学术包含了事实、命题、价值判断三个层次,其中价值判断是最高层次;人文学术"除了它的知识以外,它还会包括一种与价
[Abstract]:Recently, the General Office of the State Council issued the guiding opinions on optimizing the academic Environment, which put forward some suggestions on the reform of the operation, management and evaluation of academic research, which is gratifying! Indeed, there are many problems in academic research at present, which need to be solved urgently. As far as humanities and academic research is concerned, technicalization is the most serious crisis. The difference between humanities and academic science, natural science and social science lies in that it focuses on exploring the significance and realm of human existence, and takes the construction of human spiritual home and ideal world as its duty. Dilthey believes that humanities includes three levels of fact, proposition and value judgment, among which value judgment is the highest level; humanities academic "in addition to its knowledge, it will also include a kind of value and price".
【分类号】:C12
本文编号:2481182
[Abstract]:Recently, the General Office of the State Council issued the guiding opinions on optimizing the academic Environment, which put forward some suggestions on the reform of the operation, management and evaluation of academic research, which is gratifying! Indeed, there are many problems in academic research at present, which need to be solved urgently. As far as humanities and academic research is concerned, technicalization is the most serious crisis. The difference between humanities and academic science, natural science and social science lies in that it focuses on exploring the significance and realm of human existence, and takes the construction of human spiritual home and ideal world as its duty. Dilthey believes that humanities includes three levels of fact, proposition and value judgment, among which value judgment is the highest level; humanities academic "in addition to its knowledge, it will also include a kind of value and price".
【分类号】:C12
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张岂之;简议人文学术与个性[J];学术界;2000年03期
2 朱寿桐;“方法论”的引领:世纪之交的中国人文学术[J];河北学刊;2003年03期
3 吴展良;传统人文学术的未来[J];开放时代;2004年02期
4 朱寿桐;制约当代中国人文学术发展的两大问题[J];河北学刊;2004年03期
5 兰天;西部开发与西部青年人文学者的崛起——《西部开发与人文学术丛书》评介[J];西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年03期
6 付长珍;“全球化与人文学术发展”国际学术研讨会召开[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年04期
7 敬文东;;那些实在难缠的问题——关于人文学术的十一条注记[J];粤海风;2005年06期
8 栾栋;;论人文学术还家——兼释“文史哲互根”[J];学术研究;2007年10期
9 缪军荣;人文学术研究与体验[J];社会科学辑刊;1995年05期
10 缪军荣;体验与人文学术研究[J];学术月刊;1995年08期
相关重要报纸文章 前4条
1 曲阜师范大学 崔茂新;当代人文学术创新跑径构想[N];社会科学报;2006年
2 王学典;走一条宽广的人文学术人才培养之路[N];中华读书报;2013年
3 中国人民大学哲学院副院长、中国人民大学孔子研究院秘书长、教授 彭永捷;重振国学:一场新的文化启蒙[N];今日信息报;2005年
4 谢维俭;人文学术的中国特色[N];社会科学报;2004年
,本文编号:2481182
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2481182.html