控制或合作：社区治理中的政府行为研究

发布时间：2019-06-20 10:23

【摘要】：从中国城市基层社会的发展脉络可见,在单位制时代,社会完全处于政府的控制之下；随着单位制的解体和社区建设的提出,社区逐渐成为一个具有创新活力的空间,生发于社会基层的公民社会组织开始打破行政管理体制的束缚。但是,党和政府在社区中的延伸与扩张逐渐使相对独立的公民社会组织在权力和资源上依附或从属于国家体系,于是,公民社会组织“被动地”在参与中成长。与此同时,社会矛盾不断凸显,政府由控制转向合作将是城市基层社会治理的一种可行路径；因此,社区治理结构转型和社会管理体制改革成为新时期理顺政府与社会关系的良好契机。从社区治理主体间关系和社区治理主体及其功能区分度两个维度构建出的社区治理分类模型,将当前中国城市社区治理分为参与式、保障式、全能式和资本式四种；分析表明,这个模型具有一定的解释力。国家与社会合作关系的建立应强调各自的主体性,这也意味着,政府对社会的管理存在一个边界。社区以其多元化的主体及其复杂关系成为理顺政府与社会关系的绝佳研究场域。在社区治理结构上,政府在社区中的边界止于常规状态下的“零组织”以及非常规状态下的临时组织。在社区公共服务上,政府的边界应该止于其自身的“天职”和构建良好的公共服务体制。在空间性上,政府应该打破社区按行政区域划分的方式,树立大社区的观念。
[Abstract]:It can be seen from the development of the urban grass-roots society in China that in the era of the unit system, the society is completely under the control of the government. With the disintegration of the unit system and the proposal of community construction, the community has gradually become an innovative and dynamic space, and the civil society organizations born at the grass-roots level of the society have begun to break the shackles of the administrative management system. However, the extension and expansion of the party and the government in the community gradually make the relatively independent civil society organizations depend on or subordinate to the state system in terms of power and resources, so civil society organizations "passively" grow up in the process of participation. At the same time, social contradictions continue to highlight, the government from control to cooperation will be a feasible way of urban grass-roots social governance; therefore, the transformation of community governance structure and social management system reform has become a good opportunity to straighten out the social relations between the government and the society in the new period. The classification model of community governance is constructed from two dimensions: the relationship between community governance subjects and the classification of community governance subjects and their functional areas, and the current urban community governance in China is divided into four types: participation, guarantee, omnipotence and capital, and the analysis shows that this model has certain explanatory power. The establishment of cooperative relationship between the state and the society should emphasize their own subjectivity, which also means that there is a boundary for the government to manage the society. Community has become an excellent research field for straightening out the social relations between government and society because of its pluralistic subject and its complex relationship. In the community governance structure, the boundary of the government in the community ends with the "zero organization" in the conventional state and the temporary organization in the unconventional state. In community public service, the boundary of government should stop at its own "duty" and build a good public service system. In terms of space, the government should break the way of dividing the community according to the administrative area and establish the concept of large community.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：C912.8

【相似文献】