今天我们怎样实践学术本土化——以国家—社会关系范式的应用为例

发布时间：2019-07-31 08:27

【摘要】："本土化"是一个充满张力的议题。当以人类社会为对象的社会科学在国内整体上被窄化为中国现实问题研究时,"本土化"不仅会限定学者的探索目标和问题意识,在实际的理论和方法的应用中,也会不可避免地出现偏差和扭曲,比如以"中国的需要"为基准来对外部理论进行拿来主义的功利的切割。就学界整体而言,如果学者对"西方—中国"的知识分类习以为常,对"为现实之需"的学术宗旨深信不疑,又对探索人类社会的命运及普遍问题缺乏兴趣,在这种学术生态下,学者所实践的本土化、所提炼的特殊性对人类社会及社会科学的意义,也难免是有限的甚至是可疑的。走出困境,我们需要重构经验世界,这有赖于中国人文社会科学基础性研究和应用研究的综合、全面的发展,也有赖于社会科学研究者基于规范的社会科学方法论训练基础上的对历史和文化的回归。
[Abstract]:Localization is a topic full of tension. When the social sciences with human society as the object are narrowed into the study of Chinese realistic problems as a whole, "localization" will not only limit the exploration objectives and problem consciousness of scholars, but also inevitably deviate and distort in the application of practical theories and methods, such as cutting the utilitarian utility of borrowlism on the basis of "China's needs". As a whole, if scholars are used to the classification of knowledge in "West-China", believe in the academic purpose of "for the needs of reality", and lack interest in exploring the fate and universal problems of human society, the localization of scholars' practice and the significance of the particularity extracted to human society and social sciences are inevitably limited or even suspicious. To get out of the predicament, we need to reconstruct the empirical world, which depends on the synthesis and comprehensive development of the basic and applied research of humanities and social sciences in China, and also depends on the return of history and culture on the basis of the training of social science researchers on the basis of normative social science methodology.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目的资助(14AZD025) 上海师范大学都市文化研究中心支持
【分类号】：C03

【参考文献】