恩格斯民族习惯法理论及其在中国史研究中的应用

发布时间：2018-01-18 15:42

本文关键词：恩格斯民族习惯法理论及其在中国史研究中的应用　出处：《史学理论研究》2014年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：恩格斯对民族习惯法有精辟论述,认为一个民族的生产关系等客观条件决定其法律;即使是处于被统治地位的民族,其民族习惯法也将因为经济基础和生产关系的保留而长期保留,直至整个生产组织形式被彻底摧毁或改变。恩格斯的观点对于研究多民族国家的法律史很有借鉴意义。在中华民族多民族统一和融合的进程中,各民族之间在法律文化上也同样发生着碰撞和融合。由于中原汉民族的农耕文明相对先进,进入中原的少数民族往往会在封建化过程中采取汉民族的法律而放弃自己原本基于游牧或渔猎的民族习惯法。这与恩格斯基于欧洲历史的论断相符合。同时应该注意,中国历史有着自身的独特特征:无论少数民族是否处于统治地位,其习惯法总是与中原王朝的制定法先共存,后融合。在此过程中少数民族往往是主动的,这源于中华民族自身的特点,特别是中原文化兼收并蓄的特点。
[Abstract]:Engels has a brilliant exposition of the national customary law, that a nation's production relations and other objective conditions determine the law; even was dominant in the nation, the national customary law will also be retained because of the economic base and the relations of production and long-term retention, until the entire production organization is completely destroyed by Engels's point of view or change. Very useful for legal history of multi-ethnic country. In the multi nationality unity and integration process between the various ethnic groups in the legal culture also clash and fusion. Because of the Han Chinese agricultural civilization is relatively advanced, the central plains into ethnic minorities tend to adopt in the process of Chinese feudal the national law and the customary law had to give up their nomadic or fishing. Based on this and Engels history of Europe based on the conclusion consistent. At the same time it should be noted that Chinese History has its own special characteristics: no matter whether the minority dominant law, always with the Central Plains Dynasty its customary law to coexist, after fusion. In this process, the minority is often active in the Chinese nation, the source of their own, especially in the original text of eclectic.

【作者单位】：辽宁师范大学历史文化旅游学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“辽金元时期民族习惯法与中原汉法的冲突与融合”(项目批准号11CFX011)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K09
【正文快照】： 习惯法,通常是相对于国家制定法而言的,它是特定群体共同意志的体现,源于社会中业已存在的各种各样的习惯。民族习惯法是各民族在长期的生产生活实践中逐渐形成的本民族的习惯法,用于维护本民族的整体利益和民族内部秩序,促进民族地区的安定和发展。恩格斯在一系列著作中,分析

【共引文献】