当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 史学理论论文 >

试论李达的史学研究

发布时间:2018-03-28 15:03

  本文选题:李达 切入点:湖湘文化 出处:《湘潭大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:20世纪是中国史学由传统向现代转型的时期,历史学在这100年中发生了巨大的变化,产生了许多新的理论和方法,而唯物史观的传播和研究是这一时期最显著的成就。李达是我国早期宣传和研究唯物史观的学者,在深入研究唯物史观后又以这一理论为指导论述了近代以来的中国历史,并以此为指导探索中国革命的道路,为中国共产党领导的无产阶级革命提供了理论基础。李达是一位伟大的马克思主义理论家,他在多个学科领域都有研究,而他在史学领域的研究成就并未被世人所熟知,其史学研究仍值得进一步来挖掘。本文从五个部分来论述李达及其史学研究,探讨李达史学研究的背景、过程、实践及影响,以此来发现李达在史学研究方面的演变过程。第一部分主要是对李达史学研究的溯源,介绍李达学术价值观的源泉和湖湘文化中经世致用史学思想对他的影响,以及其史学研究的根本诉求——爱国主义;第二部分以李达的唯物史观研究为核心,论述了李达对唯物史观的研究过程和理论贡献,对他的唯物史观有一个较为深入的分析,还分析了李达如何用唯物史观做指导来对中国历史及革命道路进行初步探索;第三部分聚焦在李达的中国近代经济史研究,以李达的经济史的著作为核心分纵向和横向来研究,纵向方面以时间为轴,综合论述李达在近代经济史方面的研究,横向方面分农业、手工业和资本主义工商业三个方面来论述,力求详实展现李达在中国近代经济史这一领域的研究成果;第四部分总结李达用唯物史观研究历史的理论贡献以及对后辈马克思主义历史学者的影响,通过对后人的回忆资料的分析清晰地展现了李达作为一个伟大的马克思主义学者的治学品格。最后,在结语部分试图把李达的史学研究放在20世纪唯物史观派史学研究的整体发展背景下来考察李达在史学研究方面的成绩和不足之处,尝试对李达的史学研究和思想形成一个相对客观的评价。李达并不专事史学研究,他的学术研究的重心更多的是放在马克思主义哲学方面,本文选择李达学术研究中的史学方面来论述,在资料收集和理论论述方面都存在着不足,这是本文的不足之处,希望日后在收集到更多的史料以及进一步丰富了自己的理论水平后能有更深入的研究。
[Abstract]:The 20th century is the transition period of Chinese historiography from tradition to modern. In the past 100 years, great changes have taken place in history, and many new theories and methods have emerged. The dissemination and research of historical materialism is the most remarkable achievement of this period. Li Da is a scholar who propagandized and studied historical materialism in the early period of our country. After studying the historical materialism in depth, Li Da discussed the history of China since modern times under the guidance of this theory. It also provides a theoretical basis for the proletarian revolution led by the Communist Party of China. Li Da is a great Marxist theorist who has studied in many disciplines. However, his achievements in the field of historiography are not well known to the world, and his research in historiography is still worthy of further exploration. This paper discusses Li Da and his research on historiography from five parts, and discusses the background, process, practice and influence of the study of historiography. The first part is mainly about tracing back to the source of the historical research of Li Da, introducing the source of the academic values of Li Da and the influence of the applied historiography thought in Huxiang culture on him. The second part, taking Li Da's historical materialism as the core, discusses the research process and theoretical contribution of Li Da to historical materialism, and has a deeper analysis of his historical materialism. It also analyzes how Li Da uses historical materialism as a guide to explore Chinese history and the road of revolution. The third part focuses on the study of the modern economic history of China by Li Da, and studies it vertically and horizontally with the work on the economic history of Li Da as the core. Vertically, on the axis of time, it synthetically discusses Li Da's research in modern economic history, and horizontally it is divided into three aspects: agriculture, handicraft and capitalist industry and commerce. The fourth part summarizes the theoretical contribution and the influence to the later generation of Marxist historians in studying history with historical materialism. Through the analysis of the memory of later generations, Li Da's academic character as a great Marxist scholar is clearly demonstrated. Finally, In the conclusion part, the author tries to put Li Da's historical research under the background of the overall development of historical materialism in the 20th century, to investigate the achievements and shortcomings of Li Da in the study of historiography. Try to form a relatively objective evaluation of Li Da's historical studies and thoughts. Li Da does not specialize in historical research. His academic research focuses more on Marxist philosophy. This article chooses Li Da academic research in the history aspect to discuss, in the data collection and the theory elaboration aspect has the insufficiency, this is the article insufficiency, Hope to collect more historical data and further enrich their theoretical level after a more in-depth study.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:K092

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 裴庚辛;;论李达对中国近代经济研究的贡献[J];学习与实践;2015年09期

2 郎廷建;;李达对中国近代经济史的探索[J];马克思主义哲学研究;2015年01期

3 田居俭;;历史研究必须以唯物史观为指导[J];历史研究;2014年06期

4 牛润珍;;唯物史观对中国史学的十个方面影响[J];河北学刊;2013年03期

5 陈先初;;湖湘传统史学及其近代转型[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2013年01期

6 李维武;;李达对唯物史观的多向度开展[J];武汉大学学报(人文科学版);2011年01期

7 曲广娣;;论湖湘文化及其对李达的影响[J];湖湘论坛;2009年02期

8 王东,王兴斌;二十世纪上半期的中国马克思主义史学[J];历史教学问题;2005年05期

9 王学典;近五十年的中国历史学[J];历史研究;2004年01期

10 王学典,陈峰;20世纪唯物史观派史学的学术史意义[J];东岳论丛;2002年02期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 鲁涛;李达史学思想研究[D];湖南师范大学;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 卢琼;论李达的中国近代经济史研究[D];华东师范大学;2007年



本文编号:1676835

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/1676835.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户02616***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com