“浙东学派”与民国新史学:何炳松“浙东学派”论之旨趣

发布时间：2018-05-08 11:25

本文选题：浙东学派 + 何炳松　；参考：《学术研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：晚清民国时期,重新阐释、构建浙东学派成为近代学人创新学术的重要凭借。何炳松倡导新史学,以章学诚之史学沟通中西,溯源浙东学派,重构中国学术传统。何炳松由辨析程颐与朱熹之别入手,建构从程颐、南宋、明末清初、章学诚直至近代新史学的浙东学派发展系谱,誉之为宋代以降儒学正统学说的流变。此论一出,民国学界从追认正统与历史本事两层褒贬不一,延续至今。若在民国学界的历史情景与学术脉络中,考察何炳松《浙东学派溯源》及其学界回响背后的多元学术旨趣,或可尝试思索认知近代浙东学派建构历程的新路径,为建设民族国家与文明复兴提供生生不息的知识参考与思想资源。
[Abstract]:In the period of the late Qing and the Republic of China, the reinterpretation and the construction of the East Zhejiang School became an important basis for the academic innovation of modern scholars. He Bingsong advocated new historiography, communicated Chinese and Western with Zhang Xuecheng's historiography, traced back to eastern Zhejiang school, and reconstructed Chinese academic tradition. He Bingsong starts with the distinction between Cheng Yi and Zhu Xi, and constructs a pedigree from Cheng Yi, the Southern Song Dynasty, the late Ming Dynasty and the early Qing Dynasty, from which Zhang Xuecheng developed a pedigree of the Eastern Zhejiang School of Modern New historiography, which is known as the evolution of Confucian orthodoxy in the Song Dynasty. This theory, the Republic of China scholars from the recognition of orthodoxy and historical skills from the two layers of praise and criticism, continue to this day. If, in the historical scene and academic context of the Republic of China academic circles, we investigate he Bingsong's tracing to the East Zhejiang School and the plural academic purport behind the reverberation of the academic circles, we may try to think about the new path of the construction process of the Eastern Zhejiang School of Cognition in modern times. It provides endless knowledge reference and ideological resources for the construction of national state and the rejuvenation of civilization.
【作者单位】：浙江大学历史学系;
【基金】：“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K092

【相似文献】