专业史家与“四史”运动

发布时间：2018-05-16 02:24

本文选题：专业史家 + “四史”运动　；参考：《当代中国史研究》2012年04期

【摘要】："四史"运动具有与现代史学思潮相契合的一些基本理念,但由于过于强调政治目的,因而在实践中滋生乱象。专业史家着力挖掘、阐发编写"四史"对于史学研究的正面因素,试图对"四史"的编纂体例提出规范性意见,将其引入真正意义的"历史"编纂轨道,并在研究、编写"四史"方面做了积极探讨。但是,专业史家在"四史"运动中并未能扮演主角,他们从学术角度着眼的理性思考在当时也未能得到广泛应和。总体而论,专业史家虽大多衷心服膺"写人民群众的历史"这一取向,也曾付出了相当大的努力,却无力影响"四史"运动的方向,也难有更大作为。
[Abstract]:The Movement of "four History" has some basic ideas which are in accord with the trend of thought in modern historiography, but because of its too much emphasis on political purpose, it breeds chaos in practice. Professional historians make great efforts to excavate and elucidate the positive factors of compiling "four History" for the study of historiography, and try to put forward normative opinions on the compilation style of "four History", and introduce it into the "historical" compilation track of real meaning, and study it. Active discussion was made on the writing of the four History. However, the professional historians failed to play the leading role in the "four History" movement, and their rational thinking from an academic point of view was not widely accepted at that time. Generally speaking, although most professional historians sincerely accept the orientation of "writing the history of the people," they have also made considerable efforts, but they are unable to influence the direction of the "four History" movement, and can hardly do more.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院近代史研究所;
【分类号】：K092

【参考文献】