唐前班马优劣并称演变轨迹的梳理与考辨

发布时间：2018-07-11 21:49

本文选题：班马比较 + 接受美学　；参考：《史学理论研究》2010年03期

【摘要】：《史记》和《汉书》并称为我国史学的双璧,司马迁与班固的比较是传统史学批评中的重要问题,而且至今仍是学界研究的重点。《史记》问世之初被目为"谤书",统治阶级限制甚至阻碍《史记》的传播;而《汉书》撰成之后,"当世甚重其书,学者莫不讽诵焉",随之展开两部史书的优劣比较。历经汉魏六朝,到隋朝时,《史记》与《汉书》同样被列入封建正史,实现了班马优劣并称。但是,目前班马比较的权威说法是"扬班抑马为唐前班马比较的主流倾向,班马抑扬相当出现于宋明时期"。如果运用接受美学理论,从读者的角度梳理班马比较这一问题在唐前发展演变的轨迹,我们会发现班马优劣并称出现在南北朝而非宋明时期,"扬班抑马"只是东汉时期的主流倾向。
[Abstract]:"Records of the History" and "the Book of the Han Dynasty" are regarded as the two important parts of Chinese historiography. The comparison between Si Maqian and Ban Gu is an important issue in the traditional historical criticism. And it is still the focal point of academic research. When the Book of History was first published, it was regarded as a "slander book", and the ruling class restricted or even hindered the spread of the Book of History; and after the creation of the Book of the Han Dynasty, "it was a very important book in the world." Scholars do not satirize and recite Yan ", with which the two historical books are compared between the merits and demerits. After the Han, Wei and six dynasties, by the Sui Dynasty, "Records of the History" and "Han Shu" were also listed in the feudal history, realized the advantages and disadvantages of the ban Ma. However, at present, the authoritative view of the comparison of Bama is "the mainstream tendency of the comparison between Bama before Tang Dynasty and the suppression of Ma by Yang, which appeared quite well in the period of Song Ming". If we use the theory of reception aesthetics to sort out the track of the development and evolution of this issue before the Tang Dynasty from the perspective of the readers, We will find that the advantages and disadvantages of Bama appeared in the Southern and Northern dynasties rather than in the Song Ming period, and "Yang Ban Yi Ma" is only the mainstream trend of the Eastern Han Dynasty.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K092

【共引文献】