中国生存论史学的现代转化——梁启超批判中国传统史学的再认识暨纪念《新史学》发表110周年

发布时间：2018-09-01 08:27

【摘要】：梁启超对中国传统生存论史学——以皇朝生存论史学为中心、以正族—异族生存论史学和精英生存论史学为基本点的史学表现形态——的批判,为他建构现代中国生存论史学思想提供了历史的前提。正是在批判传统生存论史学的基础上,梁启超明确了生存论史学现代转化的方向,形成了以逆反性地置换传统生存论史学的历史描述、历史再现及历史阅读的主体为方式而实现"史界革命"的"新史学"方案。现代中国生存论史学形态的三种表现形式——民族生存论史学、国家生存论史学、国民生存论史学,——在梁启超对中国传统史学的批判中第一次清晰地呈现了出来。《新史学》发表以来的现代中国历史学,正是沿着梁启超建构的现代生存论史学思想的轨道并照着这三个环节演变的。今天,中国历史学家依然生活在"漫长的20世纪",即梁启超"新史学"时代,实践着梁启超的国民生存论史学思想。
[Abstract]:Liang Qichao's criticism of Chinese traditional existential historiography, which centers on the imperial dynasty's existential historiography, takes the orthodox existential historiography and elite existential historiography as the basic point. It provides a historical premise for him to construct the historical thought of modern Chinese existentialism. It was on the basis of criticizing the traditional existential historiography that Liang Qichao defined the direction of the modern transformation of existential historiography and formed a historical description of replacing the traditional existential historiography with reverse. Historical reappearance and the subject of historical reading are the way to realize the "New historiography" scheme of "History Revolution". There are three forms of modern Chinese existentialism: national existential historiography, and national existentialism historiography. For the first time in Liang Qichao's critique of traditional Chinese historiography, it was clearly presented. Modern Chinese historiography since the publication of New historiography, It is along the track of Liang Qichao's modern existential historiography thought that it evolves according to these three links. Today, Chinese historians still live in the "long 20th century", that is, Liang Qichao's "New historiography" era.
【作者单位】：河南大学世界历史研究所;《史学月刊》编辑部;河南大学历史文化学院;
【分类号】：K092

【共引文献】