当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 外交论文 >

美国“干涉”朝鲜半岛事务的缘由及途径研究

发布时间:2018-01-15 15:06

  本文关键词:美国“干涉”朝鲜半岛事务的缘由及途径研究 出处:《延边大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 干涉 朝鲜半岛 新干涉主义 东北亚


【摘要】:这篇论文通过对冷战以来,美国在朝鲜半岛地区所进行的各方面的“干涉”的研究,去更深一步探讨,在诸多的“干涉”中,美国是要达到何种战略目的,这种战略目的与目标对朝鲜半岛的和平与稳定有着如何的影响。以及朝鲜半岛区域内相关各国应该如何面对这种“干涉”行为。在朝鲜半岛区域内是否也存在着一定的合理的“干涉”行为。从古至今关于干涉的概念在国际政治与国际法中存在着各式各样的界定与看法。关于干涉的概念实在有太多种,单从汉语词典中我们去看干涉这一词汇就包含了两种含义:一是关涉、关系,如二者了无干涉;二是过问或者制止,多指不应该管硬管,如互不干涉内政。在权威的《美国百科全书》中我们也能看到这其中对“干涉”一词的解释与界定:“干涉意指一国对别国内部事务或两个国家间关系的专横干预。”在国际政治领域中,关于对美国的“介入”行为及理论的研究屡见不鲜,但是大多都是停留在以人权,人道主义,国际法中的一些层面,当然也包括一些地区范围内的研究。从这些研究中我们不难看出,美国的“干涉”已经遍布全球各个角落。从军事、文化、经济中也处处都体现着美国的种种“介入”。而朝鲜半岛对于美国来说有着不可忽视的重要战略意义。在冷战结束后,美国就利用各种借口对这一地区进行“干涉”,从而达到遏制、控制的绝对主导地位。美国的“新干涉主义”不仅削弱了联合国在维持国际和平与安全方面的作用以及国际法的权威性,还破坏了地区的安全与稳定。可以说,美国在朝鲜半岛推行的“新干涉主义”策略是其全球化战略的一部分。尤其是在冷战之后,从美国历届政府的朝鲜半岛政策来看,朝鲜半岛不但没有失去其战略价值,反而对美国产生了新的战略意义。其旧有的“遏制战略”也转变成为了“新灵活反应战略”。这一战略的目标便是威慑企图挑战美国地区控制力的国家,同时防止这些国家间的任何联合行动导致美国亚洲战略利益的损失。分析研究美国在东北亚的“新干涉主义”战略有助于我们理解美国的战略目标,并且能够启发我国在处理朝鲜半岛问题时能够“创造性的介入”。相比以往,这种更加积极主动的外交方式,不仅能够更好地维护中国的国家利益,也更加能体现中国的国际责任和义务
[Abstract]:This article through to the United States since the cold war on the Korean Peninsula in all aspects of the "interference" of the research, to further explore, in many of the "interference" in the United States, which is to achieve the strategic objective, the strategic objective is how to influence on the peace and stability on the Korean peninsula the Korean Peninsula region. And the relevant countries should be how to deal with this "interference" behavior. Whether on the Korean Peninsula in the region there are some reasonable "interference" behavior. Since ancient times about interference exists in the concept definition and every kind of views in international politics and international law. On the concept of interference and too many. From the Chinese dictionary we went to see the word interference contains two meanings: one is concerned, the relationship between the two, such as no interference; two is to intervene or stop, which should not be hard tube The tube, such as non-interference in the authority of the United States. "Encyclopedia > we can also see that the" interference "interpretation of the word and definition:" means a country to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries or two countries between arbitrary intervention. "In the field of international politics, about us" in "behavior and the theory of It is often seen. but mostly, stay in the humanitarian, human rights, some level of international law, including some areas within the scope of the study. From these studies we can see that the United States" interference "has been all over the world. From the military, culture. The economy also embodies the" intervention "of the United States. While the Korean Peninsula has an important strategic significance for the United States. At the end of the cold war, the United States will use all kinds of excuses to the area of" interference", In order to curb the absolute dominant position control. The "new interventionism" not only weaken the United Nations in the maintenance of international peace and security and the role of the authority of international law, but also destroy the security and stability in the region. It can be said that the implementation of the United States on the Korean Peninsula "new interventionism" strategy is a part of its global strategy. Especially after the cold war, from the point of view of the previous U.S. government policy on the Korean Peninsula, the Korean Peninsula has not lost its strategic value, but has a new strategic significance to the United States. The old "containment strategy" has become the "new flexible response strategy. The goal of this strategy it is an attempt to challenge the United States deterrent force control areas of the country, while preventing any joint action among these countries in Asian American strategic interests loss. Analysis of research in the United States in Northeast Asia The "new interventionism" strategy will help us understand the strategic objectives of the United States, and can inspire our country to "creative intervention" in the Korean Peninsula. Compared to the past, this more active diplomacy, not only to better safeguard the state interests Chinese, also reflects the Chinese international responsibility and obligations

【学位授予单位】:延边大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D815

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王丽萍;人道主义干预:国际政治中的理想与现实[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年06期

2 贺鉴;论冷战后的国际干预——以米洛舍维奇事件为例[J];当代世界与社会主义;2005年03期

3 张秀三;论人道主义干涉及其实质[J];东南亚研究;2001年03期

4 陈舟望;现当代挑战主权思潮批判[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);1998年01期

5 刘学成;美国预防性外交的理念与主张[J];国际问题研究;2000年04期

6 刘金质;试论冷战后美国的干涉主义[J];国际政治研究;1998年03期

7 范士明;“人道的”干预——美国对外政策中的新“克林顿主义”[J];国际政治研究;2000年01期

8 田娟;贾春阳;;试析冷战后美国外交政策中的新干涉主义[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2007年08期

9 张小明;约瑟夫·奈的“软权力”思想分析[J];美国研究;2005年01期

10 周桂银,党新凯;权力政治、国家体系和国际关系思想传统——马丁·怀特的国际关系思想[J];欧洲研究;2005年01期



本文编号:1428854

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/1428854.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户553e4***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com