“主体间承认”与体系内文化安全——以中国参与国际人权机制为例

发布时间：2018-02-20 17:14

本文关键词： 主体间承认文化安全国家安全非传统安全国际人权机制　出处：《世界经济与政治》2014年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：作者肯定了现有文化安全研究在"国家-国家"层面界定文化安全已经取得的成果,同时也指出了"国家-体系"层面对文化安全的重要意义。个体国家文化安全的获得很大程度上是来源于国际文化体系的认可,个体国家追求文化安全行为的根本动力应该是与国际文化体系的"主体间承认",而不是基于国家主体中心理性主义的成本-收益核算。因此,国家在寻求文化安全的过程中会积极参与相关领域的国际机制,参与的进程取决于双方实现"主体间承认"的水平,即使成本增加,个体国家也不会放弃参与,原因就在于参与能够带来更高阶段的"主体间承认",同时也就带来更高水平的文化安全。作者以中国参与国际人权机制的过程为例,通过分析发现,经过"彼此认可"、"接受约束"、"享有成果"三个发展阶段,中国与国际人权机制之间达到了较高水平的"主体间承认",因此双方的互动并未因成本-收益核算失衡而停滞,而是得到持续推进。
[Abstract]:The author affirms the achievements of the existing cultural security studies in defining cultural security at the "state-state" level. At the same time, it also points out the significance of the "state-system" level to the cultural security. To a large extent, the individual national cultural security comes from the recognition of the international cultural system. The fundamental motive force of individual state's pursuit of cultural security behavior should be "inter-subjectivity recognition" with the international cultural system, rather than the cost-benefit accounting based on state-centered rationalism. In the process of seeking cultural security, the state will actively participate in the international mechanisms in the relevant fields. The process of participation depends on the level of "inter-subjectivity recognition" between the two parties. Even if the costs increase, individual countries will not give up participation. The reason lies in the fact that participation can bring about a higher stage of "inter-subjectivity recognition" as well as a higher level of cultural security. The author takes the process of China's participation in international human rights mechanisms as an example and finds that. Through the three stages of "mutual recognition", "being bound" and "enjoying fruits", the relationship between China and international human rights mechanisms has reached a higher level of "inter-subjectivity recognition", so the interaction between the two sides has not been stopped because of the imbalance in cost-benefit accounting. It is being pushed on.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学政治与公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“我国积极参与国际体系变革进程研究”(项目编号:10ZD&055) 中国政法大学校级人文社会科学研究项目“中国外交的国际体系战略定位研究”(项目编号:11ZFQ81002)的资助
【分类号】：D815.7

【参考文献】