孟中印缅次区域合作的国际机制建设

发布时间：2018-02-27 14:39

本文关键词： 孟中印缅模式选择制度化水平制度有效性制度设计　出处：《南亚研究》2014年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：孟中印缅次区域合作(BCIM)的国际机制从1999年产生到现在已有15年,从二轨的地区合作论坛上升为一轨的经济走廊是该机制取得的重要进展,但仍需要进一步提升制度化水平。其现有的优势是开放性和灵活性,但也面临着五个方面的问题,即模式选择、政策不确定性、缅甸问题、互联互通问题和国内整合难题。同时,根据现有国际机制理论的发展,选取有效性和合法性作为制度化水平的衡量标准较为合适。要实现制度化水平的提升,还需要了解四国对参与构建国际机制的态度。四国对BCIM合作机制的态度还存在差异,中、孟的态度较为明确,而印、缅的态度还不明确。当前BCIM国际机制面临的问题首先是要为区域合作设定明确的目标,现有的选项包括了次区域国际组织、自贸区模式和维持现有模式。此外,还需要根据国际机制所包含的要素进行仔细设计,其中包括国际机制的成员资格、国际机制的议题范围、国际机制的集中程度和国际机制的灵活性。
[Abstract]:It has been 15 years since the establishment of the BCIM) international mechanism for regional cooperation between Bangladesh, China, India and Myanmar in 1999. The upgrading of the regional cooperation forum from track two to an economic corridor of track one is an important progress made by this mechanism. But there is still a need to further improve the level of institutionalization. Its existing strengths are openness and flexibility, but it also faces five problems, namely, model choice, policy uncertainty, and Myanmar. Connectivity issues and domestic integration challenges. At the same time, in the light of the development of existing theories of international mechanisms, it is more appropriate to select effectiveness and legitimacy as the yardstick of the level of institutionalization. It is also necessary to understand the attitude of the four countries towards participating in the construction of an international mechanism. There are still differences in the attitude of the four countries towards the BCIM cooperation mechanism. China and Bangladesh have a clearer attitude, while India, Myanmar's attitude is not clear. The current BCIM international mechanism faces the problem of setting clear goals for regional cooperation. The options available include subregional international organizations, the Free Trade Zone model and maintaining the existing model. There is also a need for careful design based on the elements contained in international mechanisms, including membership in international mechanisms, scope of topics for international mechanisms, concentration of international mechanisms and flexibility of international mechanisms.
【作者单位】：云南财经大学印度洋地区研究中心;暨南大学国际关系学院/华侨华人研究院;
【分类号】：D814.1

【共引文献】