趋同还是存异:英国学派与新自由制度主义比较研究

发布时间：2018-02-28 04:39

本文关键词： 规范国际社会英国学派新自由制度主义　出处：《教学与研究》2015年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：英国学派与新自由制度主义在四个方面存在一致性:理论诉求上强调规则和制度的重要性,独立于权力和利益之外发挥效用;把无政府状态视为国际政治的基本假设;坚持国家中心论;认为制度、规范等是社会互动的结果,并非事先给定的。二者的分歧主要有七点:理论"元"的差异;在解释因合作而导致利益增进的理论进路方面的不同;价值伦理取向上的区别;对行为体主体间的共享性认知分歧;研究方法上的人文历史方法与科学实证方法;对国际法的作用持不同态度;知识谱系上所呈现的整体面貌、理论阐释方式不同。
[Abstract]:The British school and neo-liberal institutionalism are consistent in four aspects: emphasizing the importance of rules and systems, independent of power and interests, taking anarchy as the basic hypothesis of international politics, emphasizing the importance of rules and institutions in theory. Adhere to the state-centered theory, think that the system, norms and so on are the result of social interaction, not given beforehand. There are mainly seven points in the differences between them: the differences of the theoretical "elements", the differences in the interpretation of the theoretical approaches to the enhancement of interests caused by cooperation; Differences in value and ethics; differences in shared cognition among actors; humanistic historical and scientific empirical methods in research methods; different attitudes to the role of international law; the overall appearance of knowledge genealogy, The way of theoretical interpretation is different.
【作者单位】：中央财经大学会计学院;北京市社科院外国问题研究所;
【基金】：作者主持的2012年国家社会科学基金青年项目“从科索沃到利比亚:西方人道主义干预新发展及我国对策研究”(项目号:12CGJ021)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D80

【参考文献】