当代西方恐怖主义激进化研究主要路径述评

发布时间：2018-03-11 03:25

本文选题：恐怖主义激进化　切入点：研究路径　出处：《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在反恐形势紧迫性和复杂性不断升级的今天,加深对于恐怖主义的产生和发展过程的认识,探索遏止本土恐怖主义的有效手段,是当代反恐相关研究的一大重要议题。对此,当代西方恐怖主义研究引入"激进化"概念,围绕恐怖分子"识别"和恐怖激进化过程的"干预"两个核心问题,在过去十年时间中,该研究领域涌现出大量的理论和研究路径。按照主体选择和研究侧重点的不同,这些研究路径大体可以划分为微观、中观两类,两个层面研究路径之间存在关联和共鸣,后进理论总是在试图解决前人研究的某一方面不足的基础上形成。而架构理论作为综合了中微观两个层面研究优点的研究路径,能够相对较好地回答恐怖主义激进化研究的核心问题。
[Abstract]:Today, with the urgency and complexity of the anti-terrorism situation constantly escalating, deepening the understanding of the emergence and development of terrorism and exploring effective means to curb indigenous terrorism is an important topic in contemporary counter-terrorism related studies. Contemporary western terrorism studies have introduced the concept of "radicalization", focusing on the two core issues of terrorist "identification" and "intervention" in the course of radicalization of terror over the past decade. A large number of theories and research paths have emerged in this research field. According to the differences between the main body selection and the focus of the research, these research paths can be divided into two categories: micro, meso, correlation and resonance between the two levels of research paths. The theory of backwardness is always formed on the basis of trying to solve some of the shortcomings of previous studies, and the theory of architecture is the research path that combines the advantages of the two levels of research. Can relatively well answer the core question of the radicalization of terrorism.
【作者单位】：兰州大学马克思主义学院;兰州大学中亚研究所;
【分类号】：D815.5

【共引文献】