“发展—安全关联”视角下的非洲发展道路选择:尼日利亚、安哥拉和苏丹的比较研究
发布时间:2018-03-15 06:16
本文选题:非洲 切入点:发展道路 出处:《上海国际问题研究院》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:非洲国家自独立后的发展道路历经坎坷,近期经济发展又有起色。围绕非洲国家的发展经历,学术界和政策界都有激烈争论,集中围绕究竟是内因还是外因从根本上决定了这一现象。必须承认的是,纯粹的内因论或外因论都有失偏颇,而当前结合内外因的理论解释又不够有说服力。作者认为,新近出现的“发展—安全关联”理论可有效改善这一理论贫乏。“发展—安全关联”理论探讨国内经济发展关切和外部利益关切的不同组合及其影响,从而产生了非洲国家的三种不同发展道路选择:发展优先,安全优先,抑或尝试实现发展与安全的平衡进而左右摇摆。这三种道路选择在非洲都有明确的体现。为凸显内外因素结合的不同影响,本文基于经济结构、资源禀赋、国家战略地位等基本特征的相似性,选取尼日利亚、安哥拉和苏丹三国作案例比较研究,,以观察内外因素的不同组织如何对具备相似基本特征的非洲国家的发展道路选择产生影响,并导致完全不同的发展后果的。本文认为,对仍处于较低经济发展水平的非洲国家而言,发展优先道路或许更为适合,这就要求非洲国家对内坚持发展优先、对外寻找更多合作伙伴缓解单向依赖;鉴于此,中国也需要秉承发展优先思维,与非洲共享中国的发展经验,促进中非关系的可持续发展。
[Abstract]:African countries since independence the development road of ups and downs, the recent economic development and improvement. Around the development of African countries experience, academic and policy circles have a fierce debate, focusing on whether internal or external to this phenomenon fundamentally. It must be acknowledged that the internal and external causes of the pure theory or both biased, and combined with the current theory of internal and external causes are not convincing. The author believes that the newly emerging "development - Security Association" theory can effectively improve the poor. This theory of "development security association" theory to explore the different combination of domestic economic development concerns and external interests concern and influence, resulting in the three different development path choice of African countries: development priorities, safety first, or try to realize the safety and development of the balance and swing. The three roads in Africa have Clearly reflected. Different influence highlights combined the internal and external factors, based on the economic structure, resource endowment, similarity, the basic characteristics of national strategic position of Angola and Sultan from Nigeria, three case comparative study, development in different groups of internal and external factors to similar basic features of the fabric have the choice of African countries have an impact, and led to the development of a completely different consequences. This paper argues that, on is still at a relatively low level of economic development of African countries, giving priority to the development of road may be more suitable, which requires the African countries to adhere to the priority development, looking for more foreign partners to ease the one-way dependence; in view of this, Chinese also need to uphold the development priority thinking, sharing development experiences with African Chinese, promote the sustainable development of China Africa relations.
【学位授予单位】:上海国际问题研究院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D84
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 金玲;;对非援助:中国与欧盟能否经验共享[J];国际问题研究;2010年01期
2 胡美;刘鸿武;;中国援非五十年与中国南南合作理念的成长[J];国际问题研究;2012年01期
3 克里斯·阿尔登;张春;贝尔纳多·马里亚尼;丹尼尔·拉吉;;非洲冲突后重建:中国日益增长的作用[J];国际展望;2011年06期
4 张春;;“发展-安全关联”:中美欧对非政策比较[J];欧洲研究;2009年03期
5 白小川;范勇鹏;;欧盟对中国非洲政策的回应——合作谋求可持续发展与共赢[J];世界经济与政治;2009年04期
6 贺文萍;;中国在非洲还能走多远[J];人民论坛;2010年22期
7 刘贵今;高君扬;;援建·劫持:中非关系问题与困境[J];世界知识;2012年04期
8 黄培昭;;苏丹:“最民主”国家在怪圈中发展[J];世界知识;2011年06期
9 张宏明;;西方同中国在非洲利益冲突与中国的应对策略[J];西亚非洲;2010年07期
10 刘鸿武;;凤凰浴火 涅i眯律け热つ嫉摹对乃劳觥肥銎繹J];西亚非洲;2011年07期
本文编号:1614789
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/1614789.html