以哥本哈根大会为例浅论当代美国环境外交政策

发布时间：2018-03-22 01:29

本文选题：环境外交　切入点：美国环境外交政策　出处：《湖北大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：美国环境外交自从实施第一项环境外交政策以来,走过了并不平坦的四十多年发展历程,进步与倒退循环交替,最近奥巴马政府的态度又有些“摇摆不定”,其政策的出台是出于何考虑,背后的推手又是出于何种目的,这支“离岸平衡手”又在把玩怎样的博弈,我们该如何应对与借鉴,这些都值得冷静分析与思考。当代人类面临无数挑战,但只有两个挑战真正毁灭人类。一是核战争,二是人类活动所造成的全球问题。这里要重新提到美国生理学、地理学和进化生物学家贾雷德·戴蒙德,这位谨慎的乐观者指出现代人类社会生活方式是不可持续发展的、不久远的,当代儿童和青年在有生之年必须解决世界环境问题。而我们是主动选择愉快的方式来解决问题,还是被动地接受不愉快的方式解决问题,这将影响整个世界的未来走向。通过论述,本文主要阐明以下几点关键问题：一是在“后京都时代”美国的环境外交政策真实走向问题；二是美国环境外交政策在奥巴马政府时期是否是新的倒退问题；三是美国环境外交政策是否成为继人权外交政策后又一干涉他国内政强有力的工具的问题：最后我国该如何同时应对和借鉴美国环境外交政策。文章将着重展现美国在当代以及追溯以往几十年的环境外交政策走向和发展趋势,同时剖析在本次哥本哈根全球大会上,奥巴马的发言以及美国政府的态度其真实目的.美国作为环境外交发源国,其政策的颁布均有其深层含义,要进行深层挖掘和提炼。
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the first environmental foreign policy in the United States, the United States has gone through an uneven course of more than 40 years of development, alternating between progress and retrogression. Recently, the Obama administration's attitude has been somewhat "vacillating". What are the reasons for its policy, what is the motive behind it, what kind of game is this "offshore balancing hand" playing, and how should we deal with it and learn from it? These are worthy of sober analysis and reflection. Contemporary human beings face numerous challenges, but only two of them truly destroy humanity. One is nuclear war, the other is the global problem caused by human activity. Geography and evolutionary biologist Jared Diamond, a cautious optimist, points out that modern human lifestyles are unsustainable and not long ago. Contemporary children and young people must solve the environmental problems of the world in their lifetime. Whether we choose the happy way to solve the problem actively or passively accept the unpleasant way to solve the problem will affect the future of the whole world. Through discussion, this paper mainly expounds the following key issues: first, the real trend of American environmental foreign policy in the "post-Kyoto era"; second, whether the US environmental foreign policy is a new retrogression in the Obama administration; The third is whether the environmental foreign policy of the United States has become a powerful tool for interfering in the internal affairs of other countries after the foreign policy of human rights: finally, how should our country deal with and learn from the environmental foreign policy of the United States at the same time? The article will focus on the direction and development trend of the environmental foreign policy of the United States in the contemporary and past decades, and at the same time analyze the global conference in Copenhagen. Obama's speech and the attitude of the U.S. government have their true purpose. As a source of environmental diplomacy, the promulgation of policies by the United States has its deep implications, which should be excavated and refined.
【学位授予单位】：湖北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D871.2

【相似文献】