论《里斯本条约》后欧盟外交的一致性——历史制度主义的分析

发布时间：2018-04-04 20:24

本文选题：《里斯本条约》　切入点：欧盟外交　出处：《德国研究》2014年02期

【摘要】：欧盟外交一致性的缺乏已广为研究学者和政治家诟病。为增强外交政策的一致性,欧盟通过了《里斯本条约》,创设了外交事务与安全政策高级代表,并随后建立欧洲对外行动署辅助高级代表工作。新职位和新机构的建立能否如期增强外交一致性?本文以历史制度主义为视角,结合巴尔默分析框架中的治理机制概念,对条约改革的影响进行学理分析,进而从比较公共政策的视角,探讨欧盟外交可能继续面临的三个方面的冲突。最后,文章认为,改革后的欧盟外交政策制度框架将会变得更为复杂,政策一致性难以得到真正意义上的提升,但新制度对成员国利益和价值塑造的长期影响不容忽视。
[Abstract]:The lack of EU diplomatic coherence has been widely criticized by scholars and politicians.To enhance the coherence of foreign policy, the European Union adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, created the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and subsequently established the European Agency for Foreign Action to supplement the work of the High Representative.Will the establishment of new posts and institutions improve diplomatic coherence as scheduled?From the perspective of historical institutionalism and the concept of governance mechanism in the framework of Ballmer's analysis, this paper makes a theoretical analysis of the impact of treaty reform, and then compares the perspective of public policy.To explore three possible conflicts that EU diplomacy may continue to face.Finally, the paper holds that the institutional framework of EU foreign policy after the reform will become more complex and the policy consistency will be difficult to enhance in a real sense. However, the long-term influence of the new system on the interests and values of member states should not be ignored.
【作者单位】：山东大学政治学与公共管理学院;
【分类号】：D814.1

【相似文献】