印度的G20战略与全球治理利益诉求

发布时间：2018-05-01 01:16

本文选题：印度 + 二十国集团　；参考：《南亚研究》2015年03期

【摘要】：2009年"二十国集团"(G20)第三届匹兹堡峰会《领导人声明》直接指定G20取代"七国集团"(G7)成为"国际经济合作首要平台",这标志着G20机制化建设取得阶段性突破,推动了全球治理机制重心从G7向G20过渡的功能性转移。与民间舆论有所不同,这一时期印度官方的G20政策定位整体上扬,对于G20机制化建设议题的关注显著升温,但此后立场却在模糊与清晰之间徘徊,印度国内外因素的双层博弈是这一表现的根本原因。对于非正式性政府间论坛的不信任感以及相对复杂的国际、国内局势,使印度在参与G20机制化建设过程中秉持审慎态度。在印度的大国梦想及G20机制化建设战略背景之下,系统阐述印度国内外双层博弈机理以及印度的全球治理利益理念与诉求,对于中国G20政策的制定具有重要启示与借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:In 2009, the leaders' statement of the third Pittsburgh Summit of the "Group of Twenty" (G20) directly designated the G20 to replace the "Group of Seven" (G7) as the "primary platform for international economic cooperation." this marked a breakthrough in the institutional construction of the G20. Promoted the global governance mechanism center of gravity from G 7 to the G20 transition function shift. Different from the public opinion, during this period, India's official G20 policy position rose as a whole, and attention to the G20 institutional construction issue increased significantly, but since then its position has lingered between ambiguity and clarity. The double-level game of India's domestic and foreign factors is the fundamental reason for this performance. A sense of distrust in informal intergovernmental forums and a relatively complex international and domestic situation have led India to be cautious in its participation in the G20 institutional process. Under the background of India's dream of great power and the strategy of G20 institutional construction, it is of great enlightenment and significance for China to formulate G20 policy by systematically expounding the two-level game mechanism at home and abroad as well as India's idea and demand of global governance interests.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学英语学院;
【基金】：教育部重点研究基地重大项目“G20与全球经济治理新机制:中国的定位;作用和策略”(项目编号:10JJD790021)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D835.1;D822

【相似文献】